Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sue4e3

(731 posts)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 01:24 PM Mar 2016

FDA predicts no significant environmental impact from GM mosquitoes

The FDA has taken a step in the process of deciding whether to allow the first test release in the United States of genetically modified mosquitoes to fight diseases such as those caused by the Zika virus.

FDA reviewers on March 11 released a draft statement predicting that a short-term release of male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes engineered to fail as fathers would make “no significant impact” on the environment. The England-based company Oxitec developed the OX513A mosquitoes to shrink wild populations by siring offspring that won’t live to adulthood. Brazil has approved their use, and the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District is considering a short-term experiment at Key Haven.
https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-ticker/fda-predicts-no-significant-environmental-impact-gm-mosquitoes?tgt=nr

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDA predicts no significant environmental impact from GM mosquitoes (Original Post) sue4e3 Mar 2016 OP
I want to believe this is true... idea5 Mar 2016 #1
"FDA predicts" ...Why does this phrase cause me to feel so uneasy??? Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #2
agreed sue4e3 Mar 2016 #3
They didn't predict any problems with klebsiella planticola either that I recall revbones Mar 2016 #4

idea5

(16 posts)
1. I want to believe this is true...
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 01:29 PM
Mar 2016

but can't help but think that this is the beginning of a sci-fi movie where the mosquitos take over. Very interesting science though.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
2. "FDA predicts" ...Why does this phrase cause me to feel so uneasy???
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 01:29 PM
Mar 2016

I don't want the FDA to predict, I want them to confirm safety and efficacy.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
4. They didn't predict any problems with klebsiella planticola either that I recall
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

The Deadly Genetically Engineered Bacteria that Almost Got Away: A
Cautionary Tale

In the early 1990s a European genetic engineering company was preparing to field test and then commercialize on a major scale a genetically engineered soil bacteria called Klebsiella planticola. The bacteria had been tested--as it turns out in a careless and very unscientific mannner--by scientists working for the biotech industry and was believed to be safe for the environment. Fortunately a team of independent scientists, headed by Dr. Elaine Ingham of Oregon State University, decided to run their own tests on the gene-altered Klebsiella planticola. What they discovered was not only startling, but terrifying-- the biotech industry had created a biological monster--a genetically engineered microorganism that would kill all terrestrial plants. After Ingham's expose, of course the gene-altered Klebsiella planticola was never commercialized. But as Ingham points out, the lack of pre-market safety testing of other genetically altered organisms virtually guarantees that future biological monsters will be released into the environment. Moreover it's not only genetic engineering that poses a mortal threat to our soil ecology, the soil food web, as Ingham calls it. Chemical-intensive agriculture is slowly but surely poisoning our soil and our drinking water as well.



http://online.sfsu.edu/repstein/GEessays/Klebsiellaplanticola.html
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»FDA predicts no significa...