Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:53 AM Oct 2015

What does the world eat?

The environmental movement pays a lot of attention to the amount of meat people eat. The attention is, of course, legitimate. Meat is at the top of the food chain, and as a result causes a disproportionate amount of ecological damage per calorie compared to our other main source of calories, cereal grains. Not to mention sentience issues and the morality of raising captive beings in deplorable conditions just so we can grind them up and stuff them down our gullets.

Since ferreting out global truths and contrasting them with public perception is one of my hobbies, I decided to find out how many calories per person are produced from each of these sources as a global average. As usual, our good friends at the FAO have the data readily to hand. Here's what it shows.



Today the average human citizen of the Earth gets 92.5% of their calories from grains, and 7.5% from meats.

This proportion is changing over time - in 1965 the proportion was 95% grains, and 5% meat.

Since 1965, average per capita meat production has gone up from 125 calories/day to 235 calories per day, while grain production has gone up from 2300 to 2900 calories per day.

When population growth is factored in, the production of grain calories has gone up over 2.5 times since 1965, while the production of meat calories has quadrupled. No matter how you slice, dice, bake or roast the data, that's a lot of environmental damage.

Lest anyone think I'm taking some moralistic high ground here, my diet is the exact reverse of the "average" shown above. I eat about 92.5% meat calories, with a scant 7.5% coming from grains and other sugars.

But it did surprise me to find out how little meat the population of our planet actually eats. From the tone of the internet articles, I would have assumed that most people ate more like I do.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What does the world eat? (Original Post) GliderGuider Oct 2015 OP
The FAO acctually tweated out a pie chart recently to answer just that question. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #1
sadly lapfog_1 Oct 2015 #6
We should eat Bugs sue4e3 Oct 2015 #2
No shenmue Oct 2015 #4
I know it sounds gross but it's environmentally friendly sue4e3 Oct 2015 #5
We should reduce the number of people. GliderGuider Oct 2015 #7
I've had those days sue4e3 Oct 2015 #8
I've had those days every day for the last decade. GliderGuider Oct 2015 #10
but you have to think about who that reduction in numbers include if your the one that wants it sue4e3 Oct 2015 #11
I'm childfree, which of course changes my outlook. GliderGuider Oct 2015 #12
2022 will be here soon... hunter Oct 2015 #3
A look at other foods besides grains and meat GliderGuider Oct 2015 #9

lapfog_1

(29,227 posts)
6. sadly
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 01:35 PM
Oct 2015

to a very large degree the worlds eats oil.

for fertilizer, for planting and tilling and harvesting and transport and distribution.

sue4e3

(731 posts)
5. I know it sounds gross but it's environmentally friendly
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 12:14 PM
Oct 2015

and it can be done so it doesn't look like bugs

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
10. I've had those days every day for the last decade.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:42 PM
Oct 2015

According to my analysis linked below, a truly sustainable world population is well under 100 million - or about 1% of the current population.

http://www.paulchefurka.ca/Sustainability.html

sue4e3

(731 posts)
11. but you have to think about who that reduction in numbers include if your the one that wants it
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:39 PM
Oct 2015

I don't want it to be my children and neither does any one else. So who gets lucky and who don't . On the same premise as be careful what you wish for. I understand though I get so tired of the never ending worry for my children. I don't worry for myself. I've been here a while . I figure I'm willing to see whats next. I don't want to watch it fall down on them.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
12. I'm childfree, which of course changes my outlook.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:59 AM
Oct 2015

I've come to terms with the idea that the human load on the planet will diminish, even if the collapse of the familiar crushes me and those I love in the process. The biosphere is far more important than my own life, though I still retain my monkey curiosity about what's going to happen, and my selfish desire to see some of it unfold.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
9. A look at other foods besides grains and meat
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 02:38 PM
Oct 2015

Apparently the raw production of vegetables, fruit, pulses, and tubers totals up to about 500-600 calories/day per capita in 2013.

That's twice the amount provided by meat. When those additional calorie sources are included, the proportion of meat calories in the "average human diet" drops to about 6.5%.

About 1/3 of all potential calories appear to be wasted through spoilage or rejection.

IMO the use of grain (which is essentially sugar) as our main caloric staple is the biggest issue with our diet, both in terms of its impact on our health and its associated level of environmental and ecological damage. Just to give one example of the latter, over half of all the arable (i.e. best) land on earth is covered with cereal crops, making it unavailable as habitat for other plant or animal species.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»What does the world eat?