Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumLaser fusion nears crucial milestone—National Ignition Facility approaches energy break-even point…
http://www.nature.com/news/laser-fusion-nears-crucial-milestone-1.10175[font face=Times,Times New Roman,Serif][font size=5]Laser fusion nears crucial milestone[/font]
[font size=4]National Ignition Facility approaches energy break-even point, but uncertainty over next step persists.[/font]
Eric Hand
07 March 2012
[font size=3]This could be the year the National Ignition Facility (NIF) finally lives up to its name. The facility, which boasts the worlds largest laser, is designed to trigger fusion by imploding a target pellet of hydrogen isotopes, thereby releasing more energy than will go into the shot. NIFs managers think that the end of their two-year campaign for break-even energy, or ignition, is in sight. We have all the capability to make it happen in fiscal year 2012, says Ed Moses, director of the US$3.5-billion facility, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.
But even if the champagne corks do get popped, the method a form of inertial confinement fusion faces an uncertain future. Would success mean that the US Department of Energy (DOE) will be ready to develop it into an economically viable energy source? And if so, is NIFs laser-based approach the best one? An interim report released on 7 March by a US National Academies panel concludes that it is still too early to tell, and recommends that fusion scientists explore alternative technologies for imploding the fuel.
Glen Wurden, a plasma physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, agrees, saying that scientists working on inertial confinement should be wary of putting all their eggs in the laser basket. Its premature right now, he says. He points to the troubles that have plagued a competing approach to fusion magnetic confinement and its flagship project ITER, a $21-billion international fusion experiment under construction at St-Paul-lez-Durance, France. Wurden blames ITERs delays and ballooning costs on a premature commitment to a technology known as a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped cage within which powerful electromagnets confine a fusion plasma.
Despite early confidence, bolstered by favourable computer models, NIF too has lagged behind schedule. It thought it had ignition in the bag, says Wurden. Instead, NIFs approach to heating and compressing the hydrogen isotopes has proved troublesome. In what is known as indirect drive, the lasers multiple beams are focused at the openings in a pencil-eraser-sized gold cylinder called a hohlraum, blasting the insides to create X-rays.The X-rays then heat and squeeze the fuel pellet inside the hohlraum to produce fusion. But unexpectedly turbulent interactions between the laser light and the plasma inside the hohlraum sap energy from the beams. That could wipe out any gains as NIF managers ramp up the laser energy to the threshold needed for ignition.
[/font][/font]
[font size=4]National Ignition Facility approaches energy break-even point, but uncertainty over next step persists.[/font]
Eric Hand
07 March 2012
[font size=3]This could be the year the National Ignition Facility (NIF) finally lives up to its name. The facility, which boasts the worlds largest laser, is designed to trigger fusion by imploding a target pellet of hydrogen isotopes, thereby releasing more energy than will go into the shot. NIFs managers think that the end of their two-year campaign for break-even energy, or ignition, is in sight. We have all the capability to make it happen in fiscal year 2012, says Ed Moses, director of the US$3.5-billion facility, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.
But even if the champagne corks do get popped, the method a form of inertial confinement fusion faces an uncertain future. Would success mean that the US Department of Energy (DOE) will be ready to develop it into an economically viable energy source? And if so, is NIFs laser-based approach the best one? An interim report released on 7 March by a US National Academies panel concludes that it is still too early to tell, and recommends that fusion scientists explore alternative technologies for imploding the fuel.
Glen Wurden, a plasma physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, agrees, saying that scientists working on inertial confinement should be wary of putting all their eggs in the laser basket. Its premature right now, he says. He points to the troubles that have plagued a competing approach to fusion magnetic confinement and its flagship project ITER, a $21-billion international fusion experiment under construction at St-Paul-lez-Durance, France. Wurden blames ITERs delays and ballooning costs on a premature commitment to a technology known as a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped cage within which powerful electromagnets confine a fusion plasma.
Despite early confidence, bolstered by favourable computer models, NIF too has lagged behind schedule. It thought it had ignition in the bag, says Wurden. Instead, NIFs approach to heating and compressing the hydrogen isotopes has proved troublesome. In what is known as indirect drive, the lasers multiple beams are focused at the openings in a pencil-eraser-sized gold cylinder called a hohlraum, blasting the insides to create X-rays.The X-rays then heat and squeeze the fuel pellet inside the hohlraum to produce fusion. But unexpectedly turbulent interactions between the laser light and the plasma inside the hohlraum sap energy from the beams. That could wipe out any gains as NIF managers ramp up the laser energy to the threshold needed for ignition.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 882 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Laser fusion nears crucial milestone—National Ignition Facility approaches energy break-even point… (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Mar 2012
OP
PamW
(1,825 posts)1. National Academies calls for expanded nuclear-fusion research
National Academies calls for expanded nuclear-fusion research
http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20120309-national-academies-calls-for-expanded-nuclearfusion-research
A National Academies panel, however, says in the report that enough progress has been made, and the need for alternative energy supplies is so great, that the government should consider allowing the use of its National Ignition Facility (NIF) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in California, for tests of creating energy from nuclear fusion.
PamW
http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20120309-national-academies-calls-for-expanded-nuclearfusion-research
A National Academies panel, however, says in the report that enough progress has been made, and the need for alternative energy supplies is so great, that the government should consider allowing the use of its National Ignition Facility (NIF) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in California, for tests of creating energy from nuclear fusion.
PamW