Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumClinton Unveils Climate Plan, Which Says Nothing Re. Keystone XL, Fracking, Offshore Drilling
EDIT
The Clinton package is incomplete, however. Unlike her rivals in the Democratic presidential contest, Clinton has yet to take a position on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport oil from the Canadian tar sands to Gulf Coast ports. She also has yet to weigh in on a campaign to ban hydraulic fracturing nationwide, or to take a firm position on offshore oil drilling.
The proposal Clinton released Sunday for boosting solar installations by 700% is vague on details about how it would be funded.
Clinton continues to enjoy a commanding lead among Democratic primary voters. She seems unconcerned by the more detailed and aggressive proposals offered by challengers within her party. Clintons plan, which campaign officials said is just the first part of a larger platform that will be rolled out gradually, appeared to be aimed squarely at distinguishing her from Republicans.
ED. - emphasis added.
In a campaign video detailing her plan, Clinton said, Its hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who would rather remind us theyre not scientists than listen to those who are.
EDIT
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-hillary-clinton-climate-policy-20150726-story.html
Divernan
(15,480 posts)From the OP link:
Some environmentalists are uneasy with Clintons approach so far to climate change. They would like to have seen her work as secretary of State to scuttle the Keystone project. Her relationships with donors and advisors connected to large fossil fuel companies make them anxious. And her support during her 2008 presidential run for clean coal as a viable, green alternative has not been forgotten.
At a town hall event in New Hampshire this month, an activist with 350.org pushed her to commit to banning fossil fuel extraction on public land. Clinton declined to do so, saying such energy production is necessary to keep the economy moving until there are enough alternatives in place.
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)Her position on the environment concerns me.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Sometimes millions of years . . . .
mucifer
(23,550 posts)for the environment:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/02/un-report-meat-free-diet
cprise
(8,445 posts)But he himself has switched to veganism.
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)[font size=5]Clinton's Bold Clean Energy Plan Is Within Reach[/font]
Posted: 07/27/2015 5:20 pm EDT
[font size=3]This week Hillary Clinton vowed that as president she will ensure America gets 33 percent of its energy from clean, renewable resources like wind and solar power by 2027. This is a bold plan. But more importantly, it is an achievable one.
Our nation has abundant clean energy resources and tapping them will generate jobs, make the air safer to breathe and tackle climate change--the greatest environmental crisis of our time. An ambitious goal like this will accelerate clean energy around the world, as costs are driven down, technology is unleashed and innovation takes hold.
I have been fighting climate change for two decades, and people often ask me how I remain hopeful in the face of extreme weather and grim forecasts. The answer is simple: I see countless solutions spreading across the nation and across the world. But we need more investment.
Clean, renewable power is one of the brightest solutions we have. By seizing this enormous opportunity, Clinton's plan will slash climate change pollution and create much needed jobs.
...[/font][/font]