Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
xpost: Which candidate would be most effective on climate change - mitigation AND coping with conseq (Original Post) bananas Jul 2015 OP
As I posted, after suggesting DUers have their heads in the sand: elleng Jul 2015 #1
This why currently PATRICK Jul 2015 #2

elleng

(130,983 posts)
1. As I posted, after suggesting DUers have their heads in the sand:
Sat Jul 11, 2015, 01:06 AM
Jul 2015

Martin O'Malley Is a Real Climate Hawk.
The data-loving Maryland gov could have the greenest credentials of any '16 contender.

O'Malley is the rare elected official who seems genuinely motivated to address climate change. "I deal with a lot of politicians in my work as a climate advocate," says Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. "Martin O'Malley, more than any politician I know, really loses sleep over climate change. He is deeply concerned about climate change and his actions over the last eight years reveal that. He's pushed the envelope more than anyone I've seen. He's the kind of politician where his staff comes in and says, ‘Here's what we propose to do,' and most politicians would say, ‘Let's cut that down a little,' and Martin O'Malley regularly says, ‘We can't do better than that? Push a little harder?'"

Maryland, because it's part of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), requires its electric utilities to buy permits for their carbon pollution. The cost of those permits, according to the state government's estimate, raises electricity bills by only an average of 0.61 percent. The proceeds, around $80 million this year, go into energy-efficiency programs that can then help lower utility bills for Maryland citizens.

The state is also pushing ahead with lots of other, smaller initiatives to cut greenhouse gas emissions. To reduce methane creation from landfills, for example, it is trying to amp up recycling and composting with the goal of reaching 65 percent waste diversion by 2020. It is planting trees on public land to expand carbon sinks, it follows the highest International Energy Conservation Code from the International Code Council for public buildings, and it is expanding rail lines in Baltimore and the Maryland suburbs of D.C.

Beyond RGGI, Maryland mostly has to rely on carrots rather than sticks to entice non-government entities to cut emissions. For example, the state is reducing peak energy demand by offering discounts on electricity bills to consumers who cut their peak-time usage. Maryland's secretary of natural resources, Joseph Gill, is overseeing a state program to plant trees on private land. "I went to the first planting in Montgomery County and the homeowner said he spent six hours a week mowing his huge lawn and he was thrilled to see 400 trees going in," Gill recounts at the ClimateStat meeting.

The O'Malley administration boasts that Maryland's greenhouse gas emissions are down 9.7 percent since 2006, the year before he took office.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/12/martin-omalley-longshot-presidential-candidate-and-real-climate-hawk

We should incentivize production of clean energy—it's better for our environment & consumers.

- Martin O'Malley

A JOBS AGENDA FOR IOWA'S RENEWABLE ENERGY FUTURE
As a nation we have made great strides toward becoming energy independent. Now is the time to accelerate that progress.

I believe, within 35 years, our country can and should be 100% powered by clean energy, supported by millions of new jobs. But we have to accelerate the transition right now.

https://martinomalley.com/climate/iowa/

"Thus far, no other candidate has said they're going to make climate change their top priority.

Martin O'Malley has not only done that, but he has outlined a plan that would enact emissions reductions in line with what scientists say is necessary to slow global climate change—worldwide emissions reductions of 40-70 percent by 2050—and he's the only candidate to do that, too. His plan would phase out fossil-fueled power plants altogether, by midcentury. Along with the USA Today op-ed, he released a white paper further outlining his scheme."

‪#?OMalley2016‬ ‪#?NewLeadership‬ ‪#?CleanEnergy‬

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
2. This why currently
Sat Jul 11, 2015, 07:23 AM
Jul 2015

good governors have better creds than good Senators. They can actually work on an deal with real issues while Bernie has has had to work with triangulation strangulation of the progressive Dems he also had to stand apart from. Legislators in a working semi-progressive nation government have a grander stage to make results for their vocal stands. The executive microcosm gives a better Presidential job resume by its nature in the horrible gridlock at the top. Sanders has performed better and more consistently in that gridlock than most of the others which is why we have so few viable candidates people could even rally to.

Sanders has had to face a governing body that can barely not kill already weak treaties and standards. Yet he has a viable and revolutionary voice while O'Malley is still unknown- as were most other governor to President candidates in recent history. If only we had better national scrutiny of good candidates than the current parade of stupidly famed and over financed inferior candidates. Before idiotically hobbling themselves in a politics as wrong headed as current American banking and business models Dems had a host of possibilities. The irony was that their equal quality made it hard for them to stand out. Now the money and the scarcity of empowered progressives makes them not just few but harder to set aside the blind power of campaign finance.

Finally, in the big picture most American progressive movements had to be incrementally adopted by the dominant parties for agenda success. As in other countries I suppose, minus a revolutionary change. I don't think anyone, even the American people suffering and disillusioned the most, realize how far we have to go offering just a few very disadvantaged candidates, even the idea of a movement being suppressed in the dominant non Internet?I-phone media.

I hope time will not just grow the primary chances of better candidates but the movement necessary to enable them to accomplish anything, such as a real democratic government than work out, not enable, horrific self inflicted crises.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»xpost: Which candidate wo...