Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSmall country, big challenge: Switzerland’s upcoming transition to sustainable energy
http://bos.sagepub.com/content/71/4/51.full[font face=Serif][font size=5]Small country, big challenge: Switzerlands upcoming transition to sustainable energy[/font]
Dominic A. Notter
[font size=4]Abstract[/font]
[font size=3]Switzerland has long met a good portion of its energy needs by using nuclear power. But in the wake of the accident at Fukushima, the country will have to turn elsewherewhile still remaining true to its history of self-sufficiency and energy independence. This effort is made more complicated by fears that one of its traditional energy sources, hydropower, may no longer be as reliable as in the past. But with a combination of energy conservation, greater efficiencies, alternative energy sources, the smart grid, and the introduction of new technologies currently on the drawing board, the country may readily be able to replace the energy lost by the closing of its existing nuclear power plants. And the loss of the snowpack and glaciers (due to climate change) may not be as dire for Switzerlands hydropower as first anticipated.
Switzerland has a long tradition of using nuclear energy. With no reserves of coal, oil, or natural gas of its own, the country had to turn to other sources to meet its energy needs. As a result, a nation of only 8 million peoplea bit larger in population than the state of Massachusettshas five nuclear power plants, making Switzerland one of the top seven nuclear-powered nations on the planet on a per capita basis (IAEA, 2014). (The nuclear power plant at Beznau, in the countrys far north, is the worlds oldest operating nuclear power plant.) All told, nine percent of Switzerlands total energy demand is met by nuclear powera figure triple that of the United States (World Nuclear Association, 2015a).
Another telling statistic is that nearly 40 percent of Swiss electrical generation comes from nuclear power (see Figure 1). To give a sense of what that proportion means, only 19 percent of US electricity is generated from nuclear power (World Nuclear Association, 2015b). (The burning of coal has been of almost no consequence in Switzerlands total energy mix for the past 50 yearsin sharp contrast to the United States, where 44 percent of the nations electricity comes from coal (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2015)). The countrys famed train and trolley systems are all electric, with the energy to power them coming nearly entirely from a combination of hydro and nuclear power.
Over the next four decades, Switzerland will face a huge restructuring of its entire energy supply system. The new supply mix will be free from nuclear power, rather low in carbon intensity, and resting upon much higher efficiencies based on the newest and most energy-efficient technologiesalong with the development of smart grids, decentralized power suppliers, hydropower, wind power, photovoltaics, biomass, wood, and the rigorous use of burning waste to generate energy whenever materials cannot be recycled. In case of a shortfall of electricity, natural gas-powered, combined heat and power plants may be used as an intermittent alternative.
[/font][/font]
Dominic A. Notter
[font size=4]Abstract[/font]
[font size=3]Switzerland has long met a good portion of its energy needs by using nuclear power. But in the wake of the accident at Fukushima, the country will have to turn elsewherewhile still remaining true to its history of self-sufficiency and energy independence. This effort is made more complicated by fears that one of its traditional energy sources, hydropower, may no longer be as reliable as in the past. But with a combination of energy conservation, greater efficiencies, alternative energy sources, the smart grid, and the introduction of new technologies currently on the drawing board, the country may readily be able to replace the energy lost by the closing of its existing nuclear power plants. And the loss of the snowpack and glaciers (due to climate change) may not be as dire for Switzerlands hydropower as first anticipated.
Switzerland has a long tradition of using nuclear energy. With no reserves of coal, oil, or natural gas of its own, the country had to turn to other sources to meet its energy needs. As a result, a nation of only 8 million peoplea bit larger in population than the state of Massachusettshas five nuclear power plants, making Switzerland one of the top seven nuclear-powered nations on the planet on a per capita basis (IAEA, 2014). (The nuclear power plant at Beznau, in the countrys far north, is the worlds oldest operating nuclear power plant.) All told, nine percent of Switzerlands total energy demand is met by nuclear powera figure triple that of the United States (World Nuclear Association, 2015a).
Another telling statistic is that nearly 40 percent of Swiss electrical generation comes from nuclear power (see Figure 1). To give a sense of what that proportion means, only 19 percent of US electricity is generated from nuclear power (World Nuclear Association, 2015b). (The burning of coal has been of almost no consequence in Switzerlands total energy mix for the past 50 yearsin sharp contrast to the United States, where 44 percent of the nations electricity comes from coal (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2015)). The countrys famed train and trolley systems are all electric, with the energy to power them coming nearly entirely from a combination of hydro and nuclear power.
Over the next four decades, Switzerland will face a huge restructuring of its entire energy supply system. The new supply mix will be free from nuclear power, rather low in carbon intensity, and resting upon much higher efficiencies based on the newest and most energy-efficient technologiesalong with the development of smart grids, decentralized power suppliers, hydropower, wind power, photovoltaics, biomass, wood, and the rigorous use of burning waste to generate energy whenever materials cannot be recycled. In case of a shortfall of electricity, natural gas-powered, combined heat and power plants may be used as an intermittent alternative.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 499 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Small country, big challenge: Switzerland’s upcoming transition to sustainable energy (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Jul 2015
OP
eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)1. Hope the good news about hydropower holds true ...
I recently saw a news program about CH's problems with shrinking hydropower due to loss of snowmass -- the fear was that loss of hydropower would force use of more carbon-intensive technologies. Hope things work out as in the article.
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)2. Could be premature to rule out nuclear in Switzerland
Yes, they've made some legislative decisions that start to take effect in a few years...
... but public opinion there continues to support nuclear power - and the politicians haven't had to deal with paying for the transition yet. So far it's mostly words.