Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe "Self-Contradictions & Simplistic Fantasy" Of Nordhaus, Shellenberger & Breakthrough Institute
EDIT
In 2004, Shellenberger and Nordhaus wrote a notorious pamphlet, The Death of Environmentalism. That title wasnt an announcement it was a goal. They declared their conviction that modern environmentalism
must die so that something new can live.[5] Their organization has worked to achieve that death ever since. Bill Blackwater has exposed the self-contradictions, simplistic fantasy, and the sheer insubstantiality of BTIs thought, and John Bellamy Foster has shown that ecological modernization theory involves a dangerous and irresponsible case of technological hubris [and] a fateful concession to capitalisms almost unlimited destructive powers.[6] In this article I examine one specific feature of BTIs current activity: its attempt to hijack the Anthropocene, to misrepresent one of the most important scientific developments of our time so that it seems to serve Breakthroughs anti-environmental agenda.
EDIT
Breakthrough has invited influential environmental writers to a luxury California resort in June, all expenses paid, for a two-day seminar on The Good Anthropocene.[20] So dont be surprised if articles using that oxymoron appear in the mainstream media this summer. Phrases like unprecedented and unsustainable will not be emphasized, if they appear at all. The seminars message was revealed in April, in An Ecomodernist Manifesto, signed by Nordhaus and Shellenberger and 16 others, all closely associated with BTI. Subtitled From the death of environmentalism to the birth of ecomodernism, it is self-described as an affirmative and optimistic vision for a future in which we can have universal human development, freedom, and more nature through continued technological and social modernization.[21]
The manifesto extends the oxymoron, promising a good, or even great, Anthropocene if only we will reject the long-standing environmental ideal
that human societies must harmonize with nature to avoid economic and ecological collapse. Yes, you read that right. BTIs pseudo-Anthropocene requires deliberately expanding the metabolic rift between humanity and the rest of nature into a permanent chasm. After all, humans have remade the world for millennia, so more of the same must be good.
A striking feature of all BTI propaganda is the gulf between the concrete problems they admit exist and what Bill Blackwater calls the daydream quality of their positive solutions.[22] That is clearly on display in their Ecomodernist Manifesto, which proposes to solve the pressing problem of climate change with next-generation solar, advanced nuclear fission and nuclear fusion technologies that dont exist and wont soon arrive. In the meantime, BTI proposes reliance on hydroelectric dams, which can cause major environmental problems, and on carbon capture and storage, which doesnt exist in any practical form. Clearly, BTIs Good Anthropocene wont arrive before the climate and other essential elements of the Earth System reach tipping points. As Blackwater says, BTIs purported realism is actually the very height of fantasy, a contemporary form of what C. Wright Mills used to call crackpot realism.
EDIT
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2015-05-20/hijacking-the-anthropocene
hunter
(38,325 posts)It's a new angle by "business as usual."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112785806
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-32781136
bananas
(27,509 posts)Breakthrough has invited influential environmental writers to a luxury California resort in June, all expenses paid, for a two-day seminar on The Good Anthropocene.[20] So dont be surprised if articles using that oxymoron appear in the mainstream media this summer. Phrases like unprecedented and unsustainable will not be emphasized, if they appear at all.