Since 1930s, Half Of California's Big Trees Gone; Potential Link To Drier, Warmer Climate
California has lost half its big trees since the 1930s, according to a study to be published Tuesday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences—and climate change seems to be a major factor.
The number of trees larger than two feet in diameter has declined by 50 percent on more than 46,000 square miles of California forests, the new study finds. No area was immune, from the foggy northern coast to the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the San Gabriels above Los Angeles. In the Sierra high country, the number of big trees has fallen by more than 55 percent; in parts of southern California the decline was nearly 75 percent.
Many factors contributed to the decline, said Patrick McIntyre, an ecologist at the state Department of Fish and Wildlife who was the lead author of the study. Loggers targeted big trees. Housing development pushed into the woods. Zealous fire suppression has left California forests crowded with small trees that compete with big trees for resources. But in comparing a census of California forests done in the 1920s and 1930s with another survey between 2001 and 2010, McIntyre and his colleagues documented a widespread demise of big trees that was evident even in wildlands protected from logging or development.
The loss of big trees was greatest in areas where trees had suffered the greatest water deficit. The researchers estimated water stress with a computer model that calculated how much water trees were getting versus how much they needed, taking into account such things as precipitation, air temperature, soil moisture, and the timing of snowmelt.
EDIT
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/01/150119-california-forests-shrinking-climate-drought-science/
= new reply since forum marked as read
By Robert Sanders, Media Relations | January 20, 2015
[font size=3]BERKELEY — Historical California vegetation data that more than once dodged the dumpster have now proved their true value, documenting that a changing forest structure seen in the Sierra Nevada has actually happened statewide over the past 90 years.
A team of scientists from the University of California, Berkeley, UC Davis and the U.S. Geological Survey compared unique forest surveys collected by UC Berkeley alumnus Albert Wieslander in the 1920s and ‘30s with recent U.S. Forest Service data to show that the decline of large trees and increase in the density of smaller trees is not unique to the state’s mountains.
[font size=1]Severe water stress (left red) since the 1930s mirrors the decline of large trees (right red) seen throughout the state, from the Sierra Nevada to the Coast Ranges.[/font]
“Older, larger trees are declining because of disease, drought, logging and other factors, but what stands out is that this decline is statewide,” said study leader Patrick McIntyre, who began the research while a postdoctoral fellow at UC Berkeley and now manages biodiversity data for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. “Forests are becoming dominated by smaller, more densely packed trees, and oaks are becoming more dominant as pines decline.”
The authors found that the density of large trees declined in all regions of California, with declines up to 50 percent in the Sierra Nevada highlands, the south and central coast ranges and Northern California.
…[/font][/font]
