Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:58 PM Feb 2012

Citigroup: Shale oil fracking has killed peak oil

Citigroup: Shale oil fracking has killed peak oil
Peak oil is dead. Or, at the very least, it has been delayed for the foreseeable future, says Citigroup's research and analysis department.

Peak oil is the idea that at some point in time, the world's supply of crude oil will start to run dry, and fuel production will enter a plummeting death spiral. Oil's scarcity will cause prices to soar, putting massive economic strain on our oil-crazy civilisation.

Warnings about the end of oil have only been getting louder since the problem was first raised in the 50s. The US has seen oil production slip steadily since the 1970s, and the globe's conventional, easy-to-drill stuff plateaued sometime around 2004.

But in a research note, Citigroup says that the worrying "peak" of oil production has now risen far into the clouds. Thanks to new technology and a dash of good old-fashioned human ingenuity, we're able to find and extract from more sources of the fuel.


I have been predicting this for years.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Citigroup: Shale oil fracking has killed peak oil (Original Post) joshcryer Feb 2012 OP
Here is the little report they made: joshcryer Feb 2012 #1
It will only delay the inevitable....while poisoning water tables across the land AnOhioan Feb 2012 #2
And there's oil in many other places that Gman Feb 2012 #3
The rendered and refined fat... LuvLoogie Feb 2012 #5
Regardless, drm604 Feb 2012 #4
"...oil shale produces, at best, only slightly more energy than it requires." TalkingDog Feb 2012 #6
Yeah, but they use on site energy to get it out. joshcryer Feb 2012 #7
That is what I heard way back when. JDPriestly Feb 2012 #10
Peak oil is an exponential rise. They "killed" it? Why read further? saras Feb 2012 #8
That's the title of the Wired article. If you read the very next sentence... joshcryer Feb 2012 #11
"Death of the Peak Oil Hypothesis" is citi's phrase Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #13
Hyperbole, which is why Wired pulled it back a bit. joshcryer Feb 2012 #14
Actually, as I recall back in 1973-74, JDPriestly Feb 2012 #9
Before the environmental costs are acknowledged, JD? joshcryer Feb 2012 #12
It will get worse. JDPriestly Feb 2012 #15
LOL. Ok, if they say so. Arctic Dave Feb 2012 #16
Too bad shale oil doesn't help bring down oil prices globally NickB79 Feb 2012 #17
That's not part of the plan though is it? Nihil Feb 2012 #18
BTW, do not read this thread: Dead_Parrot Feb 2012 #19
Thanks for the warning. Nihil Feb 2012 #20
What happens when we run out of shale oil? ellisonz Feb 2012 #21

Gman

(24,780 posts)
3. And there's oil in many other places that
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:05 PM
Feb 2012

That will be cost effective to extract as technology evolves. I've yet to buy into peak oil.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
7. Yeah, but they use on site energy to get it out.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:42 PM
Feb 2012

So even if you have a negative EROEI it doesn't matter. That's what's most appalling about this technology. It promises to destroy vast swatchs of pristine BLM land.

The BLM is taking comments on future exploration leases, so, we'll see how it turns out: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/53577949-90/blm-march-shale-tar.html.csp

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. That is what I heard way back when.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:20 PM
Feb 2012

The technology should have improved since the time I heard about this. We shall see, but I don't put all that much weight on this considering how quickly the demand for energy has increased and the rate at which global warming is taking over.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
8. Peak oil is an exponential rise. They "killed" it? Why read further?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:04 PM
Feb 2012

Okay, it's Citigroup, and it's public relations, so I know going in that facts or falsehoods, the big picture is going to be a lie, and a costly, dangerous one for the planet.

I know they're making shitloads of money in the short-term from fracking - partly because damaging that much fundamental community stuff is good for the economy in lots of ways that don't have to do with extracting oil.

Therefore this story must be gospel truth.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
11. That's the title of the Wired article. If you read the very next sentence...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:39 PM
Feb 2012

...it says that they merely forestalled it.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
14. Hyperbole, which is why Wired pulled it back a bit.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:04 AM
Feb 2012

The actual report just says "we are going to be a major oil producer." And it makes a subtle jab at those saying we're already in Peak Oil. Yes, we've Peaked Conventional Oil, no doubt.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
9. Actually, as I recall back in 1973-74,
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:18 PM
Feb 2012

the beginning of shale oil is the peak of oil overall. Theoretically, there is a lot of oil in the shale, but how much of it will be extracted before the environmental cost is acknowledged to be too great to continue? Hard to say.

NickB79

(19,270 posts)
17. Too bad shale oil doesn't help bring down oil prices globally
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 04:20 PM
Feb 2012

We're replacing the cheap conventional wells with more expensive, slower-yielding shale and tar sands production. Even if we can keep pace with increasing global demands (big if there), oil prices will still continue to climb as the old fields peter out.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
18. That's not part of the plan though is it?
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 05:20 AM
Feb 2012

1) Oil companies thrive on short-term profit.

2) Financial corporations thrive on short-term profit.

3) Gullible people who can be persuaded that oil will last forever
will continue to provide that short-term profit without making any
attempt to either conserve or replace it.

Smiling faces in #1 & #2 as #3 work themselves into early graves
for the primary purpose of providing short-term profit.

The Plan works (and has been working for decades)!

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
20. Thanks for the warning.
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 10:23 AM
Feb 2012

No thanks for putting a temptation like that in the path of my mouse.

Methinks that the wall between the world of daylight and that of Trollheim have grown thin ...

Alternatively, the understanding of why we are in the current situation is getting stronger.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Citigroup: Shale oil frac...