Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHow much does civilization weigh?
The weight of our global civilization is the cumulative total weight of all the structural materials that we use to build our structures, machinery, implements and artifacts of all kinds.
This idea occurred to me as I was searching for a better proxy variable to represent the "PAT" side of the I=PAT equation. The criteria for acceptable proxy variables include:
It must be a measurable material quantity;
It must be produced and used throughout modern civilization;
It must have been used in its current form for a significant period of time;
It must not vary in composition or use over time;
Its role in human environmental impact should be intuitively obvious;
It should represent a significant proportion of human activity;
It must scale up as a consequence of population and economic growth;
It must have a close connection with energy use; and
It should incorporate increasing energy efficiency over time, in such a way that a parallel energy and technology analysis is not required.
Based on these criteria, I believe that the weight of human artifacts (97% of which comes from cement and steel) is is a far more accurate way of estimating the impact we are having on the biosphere than either GDP or energy consumption.
The total weight of civilization is about 125 billion tonnes today, up from about 1 billion tonnes at the beginning of the last century. In other words, the weight of human construction and artifacts has increased by a factor of 125 over the last century, while world population has only increased by a factor of 4. This increase implies that human impact of the planet's biosphere has also increased by about 125 times over the last century.
I'm now contemplating how this finding changes my perspective on the "Overpopulation vs. Overconsumption" debate.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1326 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How much does civilization weigh? (Original Post)
GliderGuider
Nov 2014
OP
pscot
(21,024 posts)1. How much does humanity weigh?
Without our shoes.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)2. 350 million tonnes without shoes. With shoes, 357 million tonnes...
:-D
pscot
(21,024 posts)3. It's terribly unhealthy to carry that much weight
We really should be slimming. Even 35 or 40 million tonnes might make a difference. But we all know how hard it is to take off, once you've put it on.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)4. That's why the Paleo diet is so highly recommended .
Response to pscot (Reply #1)
GliderGuider This message was self-deleted by its author.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)6. Updated to reflect a more plausible starting point in 1900
Last edited Mon Nov 3, 2014, 12:17 PM - Edit history (1)
See also http://www.democraticunderground.com/112777217#post4