Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 07:50 PM Nov 2014

How much does civilization weigh?

The weight of our global civilization is the cumulative total weight of all the structural materials that we use to build our structures, machinery, implements and artifacts of all kinds.

This idea occurred to me as I was searching for a better proxy variable to represent the "PAT" side of the I=PAT equation. The criteria for acceptable proxy variables include:

• It must be a measurable material quantity;
• It must be produced and used throughout modern civilization;
• It must have been used in its current form for a significant period of time;
• It must not vary in composition or use over time;
• Its role in human environmental impact should be intuitively obvious;
• It should represent a significant proportion of human activity;
• It must scale up as a consequence of population and economic growth;
• It must have a close connection with energy use; and
• It should incorporate increasing energy efficiency over time, in such a way that a parallel energy and technology analysis is not required.

Based on these criteria, I believe that the weight of human artifacts (97% of which comes from cement and steel) is is a far more accurate way of estimating the impact we are having on the biosphere than either GDP or energy consumption.

The total weight of civilization is about 125 billion tonnes today, up from about 1 billion tonnes at the beginning of the last century. In other words, the weight of human construction and artifacts has increased by a factor of 125 over the last century, while world population has only increased by a factor of 4. This increase implies that human impact of the planet's biosphere has also increased by about 125 times over the last century.

I'm now contemplating how this finding changes my perspective on the "Overpopulation vs. Overconsumption" debate.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How much does civilization weigh? (Original Post) GliderGuider Nov 2014 OP
How much does humanity weigh? pscot Nov 2014 #1
350 million tonnes without shoes. With shoes, 357 million tonnes... GliderGuider Nov 2014 #2
It's terribly unhealthy to carry that much weight pscot Nov 2014 #3
That's why the Paleo diet is so highly recommended . GliderGuider Nov 2014 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author GliderGuider Nov 2014 #5
Updated to reflect a more plausible starting point in 1900 GliderGuider Nov 2014 #6

pscot

(21,024 posts)
3. It's terribly unhealthy to carry that much weight
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 09:44 PM
Nov 2014

We really should be slimming. Even 35 or 40 million tonnes might make a difference. But we all know how hard it is to take off, once you've put it on.

Response to pscot (Reply #1)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How much does civilizatio...