Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 09:23 AM Aug 2014

Chevron Spending $1.6 Million In Richmond, CA Municipal Elections (Population 106,000)

The biggest political campaign war chest in Richmond doesn't belong to a candidate, it belongs to a corporation that hopes to steer the city's November municipal election in its favor.

Chevron, the city's main employer and taxpayer, is also the biggest spender on political campaigns - it set aside $1.6 million in a political action committee called Moving Forward that supports the oil giant's favorite City Council and mayoral candidates. Let me repeat: $1.6 million. For local elections in a city of a little over 106,000 residents.

The campaign contribution limit in Richmond for both individuals and companies is $2,500, but political action committees can spend unlimited amounts of money on "in-kind" support - money not given directly to a candidate but spent on that candidate's behalf. Moving Forward calls itself a coalition of "labor unions, small businesses and public safety and firefighters associations." But the money for the PAC comes largely, if not solely, from Chevron.

So who are the beneficiaries of Chevron's generous contribution? Richmond City Councilman Nat Bates, who's running for mayor and Donna Powers, Charles Ramsey and Al Martinez, all candidates vying for seats on the City Council.

EDIT

http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/Chevron-pouring-money-into-Richmond-election-5704673.php

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Chevron Spending $1.6 Mil...