Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Sun May 11, 2014, 07:46 PM May 2014

Guardian - Fox News Now Provides Accurate Climate Information 28% Of The Time (Up From 7%)

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has just published an analysis of 2013 climate coverage by the three major American cable news networks. The report and data are available online, and the results are summarized in the figure below.



EDIT

However, Fox did have some accurate climate coverage, including interviews with policymakers and fact-checking segments. Special Report with Bret Baier and The O'Reilly Factor were responsible for almost all of the network's accurate coverage, though both shows also had segments that featured inaccurate representations of science. The Five was the main culprit behind Fox's climate inaccuracies, and was responsible for 53% of the network's misleading coverage. If not for this program, Fox would have had a climate reporting accuracy rating of 45%.

Despite just 28% of Fox's coverage being accurate in 2013, this was a significant improvement for the network. A 2012 UCS report found that Fox News' representation of climate science was accurate just 7% of the time over a six-month study period.

On CNN, most of the segments that included inaccurate climate statements were from debates featuring guests who reject aspects of established science. Many networks like CNN and BBC that try to be 'balanced' in their climate reporting fall victim to false balance, giving the minority view disproportionate coverage, often in debate-style segments. However, two prominent CNN hosts condemned false balance this February, and since then CNN has not held a misleading debate on climate change.

EDIT

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/apr/08/fox-news-28-percent-accurate-climate-change

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pscot

(21,024 posts)
1. Murdoch may be a venal, grasping and unscrupulous
Sun May 11, 2014, 11:04 PM
May 2014

propagandist but he's not stupid. Climate change could be worth money.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
3. Hey, if it's supporting all those scientists...
Mon May 12, 2014, 12:14 PM
May 2014

Maybe it's time to climb aboard the gravy train, Rupert! Apply for a grant or two...

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
2. thing is, rw radio has a much larger audience and they're 99% denial 24/7. fox has to be more
Mon May 12, 2014, 11:27 AM
May 2014

careful about their irrationality and accuracy but rw radio is practically invisible to people with brains- 1200 stations reaching 50 mil a week- the great enabler of loon- that is why fox can lie as much as it does.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
7. A report desperately in need of specific examples, of which there must have been plenty TO MAKE
Tue May 13, 2014, 08:03 AM
May 2014

THIS ANALYSIS in the first place.

It's like a paper for a college class.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Guardian - Fox News Now P...