What was the point of the Senate’s climate talkathon? Changing the terms of the political debate
http://grist.org/politics/what-was-the-point-of-the-senates-climate-talkathon-changing-the-terms-of-the-political-debate/
?w=470&h=264
Sen. Brian Schatz, a climate hawk who pushes climate talk.
On Monday night, 31 senators pulled an all-nighter on the chambers floor. This rager wasnt for fun, though, and it wasnt because they were rushing to meet a legislative deadline. It was a climate talkathon, lasting nearly 15 hours.
To those watching the proceedings on C-SPAN, it was a little unclear what the intended purpose was. There was no bill to address climate change on the docket, and if there were it would have no chance of passing the Republican-controlled House. The only Republican who showed up, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), mocked the event. The speakers mostly rehashed well-established science and talked about the effects of extreme weather in their states sometimes very small-bore effects. Even Al Franken (D-Minn.) earnestly lamenting that turkey growers are finding it difficult to heat their barns didnt make it funny.
So what was the point? One of the major objectives was to engage the American public, and we did that, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), an organizer of the event, told Grist in a phone interview Thursday. We need more passionate enthusiasm and engagement from the public.
With this strategy, Democrats are mimicking the activism-oriented approach of their conservative Republican colleagues. When the House Republicans vote for the thousandth time to repeal Obamacare, they arent accomplishing anything tangible, but they are generating press coverage and exciting their base.