Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:35 PM Jan 2014

Elon Musk’s five insights into solar energy

Elon Musk’s five insights into solar energy
BY DOMINIC BASULTO
January 16 at 9:11 am


It’s hard to argue against Elon Musk being one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our era, responsible for bringing to market such innovative companies as PayPal, SpaceX and Tesla Motors. But it’s his role as chairman and primary shareholder in SolarCity — a solar energy company run by his cousins – that’s getting a lot of attention these days. SolarCity went public in 2012 at $8 a share and now trades at close to $70. That’s nearly a 10x investment in just two years.

So what does Elon Musk know about solar that the rest of us don’t?

1. Solar energy is inherently an exponential technology.
If there’s one thing Wall Street loves, it’s a good growth story, and that’s something that SolarCity has been careful to cultivate. The company already has 80,000 paying customers and expects to sign up 1 million customers within the next four years. That means the company will need to literally double in size every few months. Think about that for a minute: 1 million customers over four years means 250,000 new customers in 2014, or approximately 20,000 new customers each month. So the company will have doubled in size — from 80,000 to 160,000 customers — by Memorial Day weekend.

And then the company will double again, from 160,000 to 320,000; and then from 320,000 to 640,000; all the way to 4 million. That requires exponential growth to make possible in such a short time frame, so it’s no wonder that the godfather of exponential technological growth, Ray Kurzweil, has been quick to point out the remarkable growth that’s possible with solar technology. Just as computers benefit from the ability to cram a growing number of transistors on a chip (Moore’s Law), solar panels also benefit from being able to cram an ever-growing number of photovoltaic cells on them. According to Kurzweil’s calculations, we can expect to be energy independent within the next 20 years.

2. Solar is a brand, not a utility.
Elon Musk thinks about solar energy the same way he thinks about electric cars — it’s easier to sell if it’s backed by a highly-recognizable brand such as Tesla. As a result, SolarCity feels more like a traditional consumer brand, less like a faceless utility. Think about it ...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2014/01/16/elon-musks-five-insights-into-solar-energy/?tid=hpModule_1728cf4a-8a79-11e2-98d9-3012c1cd8d1e


A great complimentary read:
The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me)
By Elon Musk, Co-Founder & CEO of Tesla Motors

Posted by NYC_SKP http://www.democraticunderground.com/112762272
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
1. One of the most brilliant, fascinating people on the planet.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:56 PM
Jan 2014

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]What's more he puts his talents and energy into things that have real potential to make a positive difference in the world.

NNadir

(33,561 posts)
2. One insight he clearly lacks is the one that would give him compassion for the 99%...
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:57 PM
Jan 2014

...although it's very clear that oblivious types living in a rarefied world of which close to 7 billion people couldn't even dream - including the more than two billion people who lack basic sanitation - admire the screw-off.

It's telling, I think, that this is the sort of person who is admired by the useless "solar will save us" crowd, since in places like Germany they're using their wealth induced power to transfer even more money from the poor to the wealthy, by raising electricity prices to the luxury level and giving big tax breaks to landowners with toxic solar junk on their roofs.

With this sort it's all BMW's and Teslas and other crap that has no relevance to the people described in this link: Facts and figures: Water, sanitation and hygiene links to health

The numbers in this link blow the mind:

...500 million people are at risk from trachoma. 146 million are threatened by blindness.

In 2000, 2.4 billion people lacked access to improved sanitation. 81% of these were in rural areas.

In 2000, 1.1 billion people lacked access to improved water sources. 86% of these were in rural areas...


But let's not talk about these people; let's not hear them.

It's much more exciting to listen to some boring billionaire who builds cars for other billionaires (with a few millionaires thrown in for fun) so they can feel glib the environmentally disastrous car CULTure, and enterprise sustained by poor people who have to dig lanthanides and cadmium and tellurium for the amusement of the rich.

Many of uber rich are disgusting, given how clueless they are.

What is more disgusting is the types who worship them.

How many of these toxic grease buckets called "cars" are Teslas on this planet. 1.0%? 0.5%? 0.025%?

How much relevance does it have for the billions who suffer to make the rich rich?

History, should it survive it, will not forgive this ignorance.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
4. Bunch of sour grapes
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:04 PM
Jan 2014

with some unrelated numbers thrown in for show. Its piss-poor even as a character assassination piece. You could at least link to something that demonstrates Musk buying into the financial elitist mindset (I don't think its out there, but maybe I'm wrong).

Personally, I'm more concerned about the 'rarefied atmosphere' behind Japan's new state secrets law enacted to keep the public in the dark about nuclear reactor risks and mishaps.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
6. Didn't you know that $16B nuclear plants are the friend of the poor?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:59 PM
Jan 2014

I mean, what the hell can solar (or wind) do?

Bright sun, bright future: Can Africa unlock its solar potential?
By Teo Kermeliotis, for CNN
August 29, 2013

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/08/29/business/bright-sun-bright-future-africa/

cprise

(8,445 posts)
7. I asked our landlord about sticking one out in the garage
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 11:51 PM
Jan 2014

He said, 'But you can't hardly get none around here' ...and offered to let me put a hibachi on our patio instead.

I thought, 'Well its Japanese and it glows.'

Alas, I should have told him about Bill Gates (that wunderkind of micro-nuke-puters).

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
10. That sounds like a plan but
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 07:21 PM
Jan 2014

You might want to consider the alternative modular 'Aka Chochin' technology with its light weight containment system if you need to expand.



NickB79

(19,274 posts)
3. Nothing is "inherently exponential" for long periods of time
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:55 PM
Jan 2014

Whether we're speaking of solar panels or bacteria in a Petri dish, exponential growth rates can't be sustained for long periods of time.

I note that SciAm's blog did investigate the idea of Moore's Law applying to solar:

So is there such a phenomenon? The National Renewable Energy Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy has watched solar photovoltaic price trends since 1980. They’ve seen the price per Watt of solar modules (not counting installation) drop from $22 dollars in 1980 down to under $3 today.


See what they did there? Solar is following Moore's Law of exponential growth, so long as you ignore installation costs that would otherwise fuck up the exponential growth claim. The solar cells themselves are indeed holding true by and large, but installation costs aren't keeping up as things like automation improvements and labor costs refuse to move as much.

That doesn't mean that the growth in renewables, including solar, hasn't been anything short of stellar in recent years, or to argue against their continued deployment at the fastest rate possible. Even though I think calling solar's projected growth exponential is a distortion, we should do all we can to ensure it grows as close as possible to exponential to salvage what we can of modern civilization.

A fellow DU'er once wisely cautioned me against extrapolating short-term rates of change over long periods of time, because eventually you'll realize your young child will be 15 ft tall by the time they reach puberty

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. Not Moore's Law, but "Kurzweil's Law of Accelerating Returns"
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:54 PM
Jan 2014

What you say is true but there are a couple of areas that could be refined. First the goal specified by Musk isn't unlimited, it is clearly set at 1 million customers within 4 years.

Second is that the operative "law" being claimed for solar is "Kurzweil's Law of Accelerating Returns". I don't recall hearing of him or the law, but he seems to have a handle on the prediction thing.
This is from 2008.

Solar Power to Rule in 20 Years, Futurists Say
Robin Lloyd | February 19, 2008

BOSTON — He predicted the fall of the Soviet Union. He predicted the explosive spread of the Internet and wireless access.

Now futurist and inventor Ray Kurzweil is part of distinguished panel of engineers that says solar power will scale up to produce all the energy needs of Earth's people in 20 years.

....

Kurzweil, author of "The Singularity Is Near" and "The Age of Intelligent Machines," worked on the solar energy solution with Google Co-Founder Larry Page as part of a panel of experts convened by the National Association of Engineers to address the 14 "grand challenges of the 21st century," including making solar energy more economical. The panel's findings were announced here last week at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Solar to compete in five years
Solar and wind power currently supply about 1 percent of the world's energy needs, Kurzweil said, but advances in technology are about to expand with the introduction of nano-engineered materials for solar panels, making them far more efficient, lighter and easier to install. Google has invested substantially in companies pioneering these approaches.

Regardless of any one technology, members of the panel are "confident that we are not that far away from a tipping point where energy from solar will be [economically] competitive with fossil fuels," Kurzweil said, adding that it could happen within five years.

The reason why solar energy technologies will advance exponentially, Kurzweil said, is because it is an "information technology" (one for which we can measure the information content), and thereby subject to the Law of Accelerating Returns.

"We also see an exponential progression in the use of solar energy," he said. "It is doubling now every two years. Doubling every two years means multiplying by 1,000 in 20 years. At that rate we'll meet 100 percent of our energy needs in 20 years."

...


http://www.livescience.com/4824-solar-power-rule-20-years-futurists.html



And this is last month. There is a video interview that goes with it.
Ray Kurzweil: This is your future
By futurist Ray Kurzweil, Special to CNN
December 26, 2013

Editor's note: Ray Kurzweil is one of the world's leading inventors, thinkers, and futurists, with a 30-year track record of accurate predictions. Called "the restless genius" by The Wall Street Journal and "the ultimate thinking machine" by Forbes magazine, Kurzweil was selected as one of the top entrepreneurs by Inc. magazine, which described him as the "rightful heir to Thomas Edison." Ray has written five national best-selling books. He is Director of Engineering at Google. Below are five ways he predicts our lives will change.

<snip>

By 2030 solar energy will have the capacity to meet all of our energy needs. The production of food and clean water will also be revolutionized.

If we could capture one part in ten thousand of the sunlight that falls on the Earth we could meet 100% of our energy needs, using this renewable and environmentally friendly source.

As we apply new molecular scale technologies to solar panels, the cost per watt is coming down rapidly. Already Deutsche Bank, in a recent report, wrote "The cost of unsubsidized solar power is about the same as the cost of electricity from the grid in India and Italy. By 2014 even more countries will achieve solar 'grid parity.'"
The total number of watts of electricity produced by solar energy is growing exponentially, doubling every two years. It is now less than seven doublings from 100%...

A lot more at http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/10/business/ray-kurzweil-future-of-human-life/index.html

And last, it isn't puberty. Puberty the transition phase that stops the growth which would otherwise lead to 15ft tall by 25y/o.

It's good you're paying attention though.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
14. Actually, it could continue for a very long time.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 11:25 PM
Jan 2014

People already have to re-roof their houses every so many years, and solar cells are already being embedded into roofing material. So the cost of installing solar will become zilch since people have to re-roof anyway - the installation costs get absorbed into existing maintenance costs.

Also, like Musk, I believe it's time we start settling the rest of the solar system. Spacecraft solar power has been doubling every four years*. In space, we'll be able to build extremely large solar power plants out of very thin material, for spacecraft propulsion, asteroid mining, and beaming energy to rectennas on the surface of Earth and Mars.


*See Figure 4 in "300-kW Solar Electric Propulsion System Configuration for Human Exploration of Near-Earth Asteroids" by John Brophy et al. downloadable from http://www.kiss.caltech.edu/workshops/space-challenge2011/references.html

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kiss.caltech.edu%2Fworkshops%2Fspace-challenge2011%2Freferences%2Fpropulsion-system%2F300-kW%2520Solar%2520Electric%2520Propulsion&docid=9c62e8f7f4dce03df0d558f53a776d89&a=bi&pagenumber=6&w=800





kristopher

(29,798 posts)
8. Good discussion of the next step in scaling solar manufacturing
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:10 AM
Jan 2014
Today’s Solar Manufacturing Paradox: Profitless Prosperity
Bringing gigawatt-scale solar manufacturing to the U.S. requires new thinking.


Brad Mattson
January 17, 2014

So if growth is to continue, who is going to loan these indebted companies the money to build new factories? The panel makers need higher prices to return to profitability and pay back their debt, but the market needs lower prices to sustain its growth. What will give?

Having seen this before in the semiconductor industry, I believe the probable scenario is that we will split the difference. Prices will muddle along, moving slowly downward to maintain growth, and what little margin is eked out will be 100 percent consumed by debt payments. High growth with no profit means we could be entering an era of “profitless prosperity” for the solar industry.

A solution exists, however. The current solar manufacturing capacity was built years ago, but designed even further back in the era of solar hobbyists. Call this Solar 1.0, the megawatt era of solar.

With demand set to reach between 45 and 55 gigawatts next year, we are truly entering the era of Solar 2.0.

Now we just need factories designed ...

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Todays-Solar-Manufacturing-Paradox-Profitless-Prosperity

PamW

(1,825 posts)
9. CRAPPY Mathematics
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 06:55 AM
Jan 2014

Something is ONLY "inherently exponential" if the first derivative or rate of change is proportional to the quantity itself. That is the quantity itself "x" is the solution of a differential equation of the form:

dx/dt = cx

For example, radioactive decay is inherently exponential since every radioactive atom is independent and has a fixed probability per unit time of decaying. Therefore, the rate at which atoms decay is proportional to the number of radioactive atoms since each is an opportunity for a decay.

Neither you nor Musk has presented ANY evidence beyond your own I'll-considered FANTASIES as to why there should be the above proportionality.

PamW

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
15. ???
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 11:51 PM
Jan 2014

wtf

I'm just saying, if there is no IP sharing the developing world will continue on a toxic trajectory

and we'll happily sell them our fossil fuel

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
16. ???
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:05 AM
Jan 2014

"wtf"

I'm just saying, your claim about intellectual property rights is as wild as being adamant about the value of undersea robot-army cities. IP is the least of the problems with getting solar into undeveloped countries.

Source: The Guardian

Kenya to generate over half of its electricity through solar power by 2016

Gitonga Njeru
theguardian.com, Friday 17 January 2014 14.19 GMT

Kenya has identified nine sites to build solar power plants that could provide more than half the country's electricity by 2016.

Construction of the plants, expected to cost $1.2bn (£73m), is set to begin this year and initial design stages are almost complete. The partnership between government and private companies will see the state contributing about 50% of the cost.

Cliff Owiti, a senior administrator at the Kenya Renewable Energy Association, said the move will protect the environment and bring down electricity costs. "We hope that when the entire project is completed by 2016, more than 50% of Kenya's energy production will consist of solar. Already we are witnessing solar investments in Kenya such as a factory that was opened here in 2011 that manufactures solar energy panels."

He said that over $500m had already been invested in solar projects in Kenya. "The costs related with hydro electricity are very high, considering they are influenced by the low water levels in major supply dams. With high investments in solar, we will witness almost no blackouts and power charges will reduce because electricity will be in high supply."

-snip-

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/17/kenya-solar-power-plants

Interesting that you are *not* one of the people who recced this post - given your great concern about the developing world, and all that...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112762393
rec'd by DUgosh kristopher diane in sf stuntcat

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
17. What fucking undersea robot armies?
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 12:24 AM
Jan 2014

Anyway, you're really grasping here. Kenya makes a little over 2GW of electricity right now. It'll grow 15x that by 2030. Of course solar accounting for half of their electricity by 2016 is a really meaningless prediction, since they'll be a net exporter of oil by 2016.

We'll revisit this in 2016, shall we?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Elon Musk’s five insights...