Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumClimate-Change Summary And Update | Guy McPherson
Guy McPherson
Dec. 20, 2013 (Nature Bats Last) -- American actress Lily Tomlin is credited with the expression, No matter how cynical you become, its never enough to keep up. With respect to climate science, my own efforts to stay abreast are blown away every week by new data, models, and assessments. It seems no matter how dire the situation becomes, it only gets worse when I check the latest reports.
The response of politicians, heads of non-governmental organizations, and corporate leaders remains the same. Theyre mired in the dank Swamp of Nothingness. As Hallor Thorgeirsson, a senior director with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, said on 17 September 2013: We are failing as an international community. We are not on track. These are the people who know about, and presumably could do something about, our ongoing race to disaster (if only to sound the alarm). Tomlins line is never more germane than when thinking about their pursuit of a buck at the expense of life on Earth.
Worse than the aforementioned trolls are the media. Fully captured by corporations and the corporate states, the media continue to dance around the issue of climate change. Occasionally a forthright piece is published, but it generally points in the wrong direction, such as suggesting climate scientists and activists be killed (e.g., James Delingpoles 7 April 2013 hate-filled article in the Telegraph).
Even mainstream scientists minimize the message at every turn. As weve known for years,scientists almost invariably underplay climate impacts. Im not implying conspiracy among scientists. Science selects for conservatism. Academia selects for extreme conservatism. These folks are loathe to risk drawing undue attention to themselves by pointing out there might be a threat to civilization. Never mind the near-term threat to our entire species (they couldnt care less about other species). If the truth is dire, they can find another, not-so-dire version. The concept is supported by an article in the February 2013 issue of Global Environmental Change pointing out that climate-change scientists routinely underestimate impacts by erring on the side of least drama. Ever late to the party, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) admits global warming is irreversible without geoengineering in a report released 27 September 2013. As pointed out in the 5 December 2013 issue of Earth System Dynamics, known strategies for geoengineering are unlikely to succeed.
If youre too busy to read the evidence presented below, heres the bottom line: On a planet 4 C hotter than baseline, all we can prepare for is human extinction (from Oliver Tickells 2008 synthesis in the Guardian).
more
http://worldnewstrust.com/climate-change-summary-and-update-guy-mcpherson
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1064 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate-Change Summary And Update | Guy McPherson (Original Post)
Tace
Jan 2014
OP
Tace
(6,800 posts)1. fyi, Here's a couple of links discussing Guy McPherson's ideas about the climate: