Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 02:11 PM Nov 2013

Yale: A Scarcity of Rare Metals Is Hindering Green Technologies

A Scarcity of Rare Metals Is Hindering Green Technologies

With the global push to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it’s ironic that several energy- or resource-saving technologies aren’t being used to the fullest simply because we don’t have enough raw materials to make them.

For example, says Alex King, director of the new Critical Materials Institute, every wind farm has a few turbines standing idle because their fragile gearboxes have broken down. They can be fixed, of course, but that takes time – and meanwhile wind power isn’t being gathered. Now you can make a more reliable wind turbine that doesn’t need a gearbox at all, King points out, but you need a truckload of so-called "rare earth" metals to do it, and there simply isn’t the supply. Likewise, we could all be using next-generation fluorescent light bulbs that are twice as efficient as the current standard. But when the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) tried to make that switch in 2009, companies like General Electric cried foul: they wouldn’t be able to get hold of enough rare earths to make the new bulbs.

The move toward new and better technologies — from smart phones to electric cars — means an ever-increasing demand for exotic metals that are scarce thanks to both geology and politics. Thin, cheap solar panels need tellurium, which makes up a scant 0.0000001 percent of the earth’s crust, making it three times rarer than gold. High-performance batteries need lithium, which is only easily extracted from briny pools in the Andes. In 2011, the average price of 'rare earth' metals shot up by as much as 750 percent. Platinum, needed as a catalyst in fuel cells that turn hydrogen into energy, comes almost exclusively from South Africa.

Researchers and industry workers alike woke with a shock to the problems caused by these dodgy supply chains in 2011, when the average price of "rare earths" — including terbium and europium, used in fluorescent bulbs; and neodymium, used in the powerful magnets that help to drive wind turbines and electric engines — shot up by as much as 750 percent in a year. The problem was that China, which controlled 97 percent of global rare earth production, had clamped down on trade. A solution was brokered and the price shock faded, but the threat of future supply problems for rare earths and other so-called "critical elements" still looms.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yale: A Scarcity of Rare Metals Is Hindering Green Technologies (Original Post) GliderGuider Nov 2013 OP
If it hurts oil, it's unavailable. nt valerief Nov 2013 #1
Prolly why they call 'em "Rare". Wilms Nov 2013 #2
Not so much. FBaggins Nov 2013 #4
extraction isn't exactly clean either phantom power Nov 2013 #3
Buying more "stuff" won't solve any problems. hunter Nov 2013 #5

FBaggins

(26,754 posts)
4. Not so much.
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 06:01 PM
Nov 2013

Most of them aren't particularly rare (about as abundant as copper for at least one of them).

Scarcity can be a market condition - not just a question of how much is in the ground.

China may have less than 1/4th of the world's rare earths, but they represent (depending on who you listen to) 90-97% of the world production. That's not because the minerals don't exist elsewhere (the US used to be the leading producer)... but because the Chinese undercut world prices so substantially that they drove the competition out of the market. Now that they're reportedly restricting access... prices will likely rise enough to bring other players back into the marketplace. But it will take some time.

hunter

(38,322 posts)
5. Buying more "stuff" won't solve any problems.
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 10:16 PM
Nov 2013

Solar panels, wind turbines, whatever...

The only lasting robust solution is growing stuff, making stuff, and building stuff using mostly local materials.

Many animals have solved basic resource problems by migration. Birds, whales, tuna, butterflies...

...but humans are not that sort of animal. Our migration capabilities are small in spite of our modern (last 40,000 years) dispersal capacities.

If we apply our minds to the problem we may be able to keep some kind of worldwide electronic information and communication infrastructure. But the big container ships will stop coming. Flying across oceans or continents will become a rare thing for anyone who doesn't have wings.

Humans are a remarkable species but we've not yet crossed the threshold of being the engines of our own creation.

For now we are just eaters of fossil fuels and other non-renewable resources. Consumers.

Until we master telepathy and teleportation, or until smart phones grow on trees and can be disposed of in compost heaps, I'm not terribly optimistic about our future.

Odds are good we are just another one of those experiments in evolution (and there have been many these past billions of years) that won't make it down the long road.

Human exceptionalism is as silly as any nationalistic exceptionalism.

Nations don't last, and even less so, species.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Yale: A Scarcity of Rare ...