Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSmall Modular Reactors: Safety, Security and Cost Concerns
Press release
Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Wont Solve Nuclear Powers Safety, Security and Cost Problems, New Report Finds
WASHINGTON (September 26, 2013)Nuclear power proponents pinning their hopes on small modular nuclear reactors to resurrect the industrys fortunes will likely be disappointed, according to a report released today by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). The report, Small Isnt Always Beautiful, concludes it will be extremely difficult for small reactorswhich are less than a third the size of a standard 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactorto generate less expensive electricity and, at the same time, be safer than their larger cousins.
Nuclear safety and security dont come cheap, said UCS Senior Scientist Edwin Lyman, the author of the report. A utility that thinks it can have its own little nuclear reactor at a bargain-basement price may get exactly what it pays for: a plant more vulnerable to serious accidents and terrorist attacks.
When the U.S. nuclear renaissance sputtered due to high construction costs, low natural gas prices and the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, the nuclear industry began to tout small reactors as way to find new customers, such as utilities that cannot afford a large reactors $8-billion price tag or countries where electric grids cannot accommodate a large reactors output. The federal government, too, has gingerly jumped on the small reactor bandwagon. The Department of Energy (DOE) is now offering $452 million in matching grants to subsidize design and licensing costs. The agency foresees deployment of a commercial small reactor by 2020.
But do small reactors make economic sense? As Lymans report points out, utilities started building larger reactors in the first place because they produce electricity at a much lower cost than smaller ones due to the principle of economies of scale. So even if small modular reactors were cheaper to build than a large reactor on a per-unit basis, they would be less cost-competitive on a per-kilowatt basis, putting enormous pressure on reactor vendors to slash the costs of construction and operation to make small reactors cost-effective.
In an attempt to reduce capital costs, small reactor vendors are cutting corners on important reactor safety features, such as containment structures, which reduce radiation releases in the event of an accident. To cut operating costs, vendors also are pressuring the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to weaken requirements for emergency planning, control room staffing, and security force staffing. And to make matters worse, the NRCs discussions with vendors on their designs and safety analyses are occurring largely in secret to allegedly protect proprietary information.
Some small modular reactor concepts may have desirable safety characteristics, said Lyman, but if they are not carefully designed, licensed, deployed and inspected, they could pose comparable or even greater safety, security and proliferation risks than large reactors. Meanwhile the vendors are hiding their design details and asking the public to trust them.
Small reactor aficionados argue that mass-producing the reactors on an assembly line instead of building customized reactors on site would cut costs. Lyman says that this is an unproven proposition and warns that any benefits of manufacturing reactors on a production line could be undercut by generic defects that would spread throughout the entire reactor fleet. Problems with modular construction already have delayed four new AP1000 reactors in Georgia and South Carolina.
It will take many years of manufacturing experience before the industry will be able to confirm that small reactors can be built as cheaply as they say, said Lyman. And that means that it will take massive taxpayer subsidies to get this industry off the ground.
The challenge for small reactor manufacturers will be to figure out how to reduce costs without sacrificing safety and security, the report concludes. It calls on the DOE and the nuclear industry to collaborate on developing nuclear plant designs that would be truly safer than the current generation, and on Congress to ensure the DOEwhich has traditionally been an unapologetic nuclear power cheerleaderto spend taxpayer money only on designs that are safer and more secure than currently operating reactors.
In the aftermath of Fukushima, the Energy Department and the industry should not be promoting the false idea that small reactors are so safe they dont need 10-mile emergency planning zones, said Lyman. Nor should they be encouraging the NRC to weaken its other safeguards just to facilitate small reactor licensing and development. That would be a recipe for disaster.
The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.
http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/small-modular-nuclear-reactor-0404.html
Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Wont Solve Nuclear Powers Safety, Security and Cost Problems, New Report Finds
WASHINGTON (September 26, 2013)Nuclear power proponents pinning their hopes on small modular nuclear reactors to resurrect the industrys fortunes will likely be disappointed, according to a report released today by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). The report, Small Isnt Always Beautiful, concludes it will be extremely difficult for small reactorswhich are less than a third the size of a standard 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactorto generate less expensive electricity and, at the same time, be safer than their larger cousins.
Nuclear safety and security dont come cheap, said UCS Senior Scientist Edwin Lyman, the author of the report. A utility that thinks it can have its own little nuclear reactor at a bargain-basement price may get exactly what it pays for: a plant more vulnerable to serious accidents and terrorist attacks.
When the U.S. nuclear renaissance sputtered due to high construction costs, low natural gas prices and the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, the nuclear industry began to tout small reactors as way to find new customers, such as utilities that cannot afford a large reactors $8-billion price tag or countries where electric grids cannot accommodate a large reactors output. The federal government, too, has gingerly jumped on the small reactor bandwagon. The Department of Energy (DOE) is now offering $452 million in matching grants to subsidize design and licensing costs. The agency foresees deployment of a commercial small reactor by 2020.
But do small reactors make economic sense? As Lymans report points out, utilities started building larger reactors in the first place because they produce electricity at a much lower cost than smaller ones due to the principle of economies of scale. So even if small modular reactors were cheaper to build than a large reactor on a per-unit basis, they would be less cost-competitive on a per-kilowatt basis, putting enormous pressure on reactor vendors to slash the costs of construction and operation to make small reactors cost-effective.
In an attempt to reduce capital costs, small reactor vendors are cutting corners on important reactor safety features, such as containment structures, which reduce radiation releases in the event of an accident. To cut operating costs, vendors also are pressuring the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to weaken requirements for emergency planning, control room staffing, and security force staffing. And to make matters worse, the NRCs discussions with vendors on their designs and safety analyses are occurring largely in secret to allegedly protect proprietary information.
Some small modular reactor concepts may have desirable safety characteristics, said Lyman, but if they are not carefully designed, licensed, deployed and inspected, they could pose comparable or even greater safety, security and proliferation risks than large reactors. Meanwhile the vendors are hiding their design details and asking the public to trust them.
Small reactor aficionados argue that mass-producing the reactors on an assembly line instead of building customized reactors on site would cut costs. Lyman says that this is an unproven proposition and warns that any benefits of manufacturing reactors on a production line could be undercut by generic defects that would spread throughout the entire reactor fleet. Problems with modular construction already have delayed four new AP1000 reactors in Georgia and South Carolina.
It will take many years of manufacturing experience before the industry will be able to confirm that small reactors can be built as cheaply as they say, said Lyman. And that means that it will take massive taxpayer subsidies to get this industry off the ground.
The challenge for small reactor manufacturers will be to figure out how to reduce costs without sacrificing safety and security, the report concludes. It calls on the DOE and the nuclear industry to collaborate on developing nuclear plant designs that would be truly safer than the current generation, and on Congress to ensure the DOEwhich has traditionally been an unapologetic nuclear power cheerleaderto spend taxpayer money only on designs that are safer and more secure than currently operating reactors.
In the aftermath of Fukushima, the Energy Department and the industry should not be promoting the false idea that small reactors are so safe they dont need 10-mile emergency planning zones, said Lyman. Nor should they be encouraging the NRC to weaken its other safeguards just to facilitate small reactor licensing and development. That would be a recipe for disaster.
The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.
http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/small-modular-nuclear-reactor-0404.html
Small Modular Reactors: Safety, Security and Cost Concerns
Small isn't always beautiful
According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and some members of the nuclear industry, the next big thing in nuclear energy will be a small thing: the small modular reactor (SMR).
SMRssmall because they generate a maximum of about 30 percent as much power as typical current reactors, and modular because they can be assembled in factories and shipped to power plant siteshave been getting a lot of positive attention recently, as the nuclear power industry has struggled to remain economically viable in an era of flat demand and increasing competition from natural gas and other energy alternatives.
SMRs have been touted as both safer and more cost-effective than older, larger nuclear reactor designs. Proponents have even suggested that SMRs are so safe that some current NRC regulations can be relaxed for them, arguing that they need fewer operators and safety officers, less robust containment structures, and less elaborate evacuation plans. Are these claims justified?
Economies of Scale and Catch-22s
SMR-based power plants can be built with a smaller capital investment than plants based on larger reactors. Proponents suggest that this will remove financial barriers that have slowed the growth of nuclear power in recent years.
However, there's a catch: affordable doesnt necessarily mean cost-effective....
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/nuclear_power_technology/small-modular-reactors.html
Small isn't always beautiful
According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and some members of the nuclear industry, the next big thing in nuclear energy will be a small thing: the small modular reactor (SMR).
SMRssmall because they generate a maximum of about 30 percent as much power as typical current reactors, and modular because they can be assembled in factories and shipped to power plant siteshave been getting a lot of positive attention recently, as the nuclear power industry has struggled to remain economically viable in an era of flat demand and increasing competition from natural gas and other energy alternatives.
SMRs have been touted as both safer and more cost-effective than older, larger nuclear reactor designs. Proponents have even suggested that SMRs are so safe that some current NRC regulations can be relaxed for them, arguing that they need fewer operators and safety officers, less robust containment structures, and less elaborate evacuation plans. Are these claims justified?
Economies of Scale and Catch-22s
SMR-based power plants can be built with a smaller capital investment than plants based on larger reactors. Proponents suggest that this will remove financial barriers that have slowed the growth of nuclear power in recent years.
However, there's a catch: affordable doesnt necessarily mean cost-effective....
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/nuclear_power_technology/small-modular-reactors.html
DOWNLOAD: Small Isn't Always Beautiful: Safety, Security, and Cost Concerns about Small Modular Reactors
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/small-isnt-always-beautiful.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 843 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Small Modular Reactors: Safety, Security and Cost Concerns (Original Post)
kristopher
Sep 2013
OP
chervilant
(8,267 posts)1. Massive taxpayer subsidies?
"... Meanwhile the vendors are hiding their design details and asking the public to trust them.
Yeah, that's gonna fly -- like a lead balloon.