Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe 21st century population crash
The United Nations (UN) projects that the global population will zoom from approximately 7.1 billion people today to 9.6 billion people by 2050. The World Bank and U.S. Census Bureau expect it to reach 9.4 billion. Other models suggest anywhere from 8.3 billion to 10.9 billion souls on the planet by 2050.
These models assume a no-surprise future and focus on three main drivers of population births, deaths and migration. Life expectancy is kept on a consistent upward trend, and unpredictable events like epidemics and wars are ruled out, National Geographic explained in its population update this year.
In other words, the population forecasts that all policymakers around the world use are based on existing trends, not resources or surprise events.
But those who look at population through the lens of resources come to very different conclusions about population growth.
These models assume a no-surprise future and focus on three main drivers of population births, deaths and migration. Life expectancy is kept on a consistent upward trend, and unpredictable events like epidemics and wars are ruled out, National Geographic explained in its population update this year.
In other words, the population forecasts that all policymakers around the world use are based on existing trends, not resources or surprise events.
But those who look at population through the lens of resources come to very different conclusions about population growth.
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/take/the-21st-century-population-crash/1117
(IMHO, there is NO prediction, by anyone, except in religious books, that could excuse giving the rest of this century to new little babies.)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 996 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 21st century population crash (Original Post)
stuntcat
Sep 2013
OP
OnlinePoker
(5,721 posts)1. If you ask me, the bugs are going to get us sooner than that
If you go by the CDC report earlier this week, antibiotics are going to be pretty much useless soon and you'll see some mega-plagues breaking out sooner rather than later. It won't be like in the movies where they can create an antivirus or antibacterial that saves the day by the third reel, either.
stuntcat
(12,022 posts)3. terrifying and true
And we aren't even close to prepared to handle it.
The fights for water have been my biggest horror, but this could be just as bad by 2050, when I have to live 'til. Lucky me
4dsc
(5,787 posts)2. We don't have the resources to support them
its going to get interesting in the next couple of decades as resources play out around the world.