Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"Judge refuses to toss climate scientist Mann’s defamation lawsuit"
Judge refuses to toss climate scientist Manns defamation lawsuitBy Ben Geman at the Hill
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/319757-judge-again-refuses-to-toss-climate-scientist-manns-defamation-suit-against-national-review
"SNIP..............................
Judge Natalia M. Combs Greene of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia writes in Friday's ruling that, The evidence before the court indicates the likelihood that actual malice is present.
The latest procedural ruling in the Pennsylvania State University scientists lawsuit is here. The Court finds that there is sufficient evidence in the record to demonstrate that Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits, the ruling states.
Mann sued the National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a conservative advocacy group, in 2012 over their blog posts that alleged his research is fraudulent.
CEIs post also compared Mann to convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky, calling Mann the Jerry Sandusky of climate science by alleging he molested and tortured data.
.............................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1806 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (48)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Judge refuses to toss climate scientist Mann’s defamation lawsuit" (Original Post)
applegrove
Sep 2013
OP
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)1. GOOD
longship
(40,416 posts)2. Excellent! "Likely to succeed on the merits" R&K nt
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)3. Great!
There should be consequences for these sort of lies. They did not just defame a man, they are standing in the way of humanity being able to save itself.
calimary
(81,298 posts)5. No kidding. That's the long and the short of it.
These bastards are standing in the way of humanity being able to save itself - and the planet. Just mainly for a few extra bucks.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)6. K&R!
Actual malice! Imagine that.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)7. Wow, Mark Steyn should be charged with lying to the court with what he said in his 'defense'
"I didn't defend the CEI with their Sandusky comparison."
Yeah, you did! It's right there!
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)8. Yep, there need to be consequences for this kind of shit
Too bad O'Reily isn't accountable for "Tiller the baby killer."