Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:14 AM Jul 2013

What A Surprise! LA Times Editorial Favors More Groundwater Withdrawals From San Fernando Valley

There is a history of alarmism over the prospect of tapping the groundwater of the San Fernando Valley for use by Los Angeles residents. "Toilet to tap" was the hysterical slogan used to denounce — and defeat — plans for reclaiming treated water and using it to quench this region's perpetual thirst. In that iteration, which flared in the late 1990s, water from a local sewage treatment plant was to be treated, pumped to the Hansen Dam area, allowed to settle through gravel and soil, mixed with other water and recycled into the water supply. The result would have been water just as clean as any other tap water, but it fell victim to the politics of San Fernando Valley secession, as cynical and cowardly politicians stirred public anxiety about the water's safety and then let the project die.

So it is with some apprehension that the city's Department of Water and Power embarks on a project to draw water from the San Fernando Groundwater Basin. This time, the issue is not reclaiming water so much as avoiding — and compensating for — the effects of World War II-era pollution. In the years of thriving defense industry production, solvents and other chemicals found their way into the water supply, creating genuine health risks to those exposed to them. Some of those chemicals are proven carcinogens and present other dangers as well.

But not all of that water is polluted, and some that is contaminated could be cleaned. As a result, and in recognition of this region's important commitment to lessen its dependency on imported water, the DWP is launching a plan to test water at 26 sites in the Valley and identify safe sources that could be further purified. If successful, that could allow the agency to draw enough water from the basin to supply more than 175,000 homes every year.

There will no doubt be anxiety associated with this project. Officials insist they will proceed with caution and will share information with city officials and community representatives as they roll out the monitoring wells and collect data. That's appropriate and welcome. The city leadership has another obligation: to recognize that Los Angeles' future requires a delicate combination of conservation and development of local water supplies to reduce reliance on water from the Eastern Sierra, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and the Colorado River, all of which are subject to droughts and competing claims.

EDIT

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-dwp-san-fernando-groundwater-20130705,0,5822208.story

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What A Surprise! LA Times Editorial Favors More Groundwater Withdrawals From San Fernando Valley (Original Post) hatrack Jul 2013 OP
Great idea, and long overdue. Even though we are a "desert", kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #1
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
1. Great idea, and long overdue. Even though we are a "desert",
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 10:48 AM
Jul 2013

we generally get more than enough rainfall over the San Fernando Valley to make a huge dent in our needs, if we would just HARVEST it rather than letting it flow straight into the ocean.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»What A Surprise! LA Time...