Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 03:51 PM Apr 2013

'A better path' toward projecting, planning for rising seas on a warmer Earth

http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S36/50/04K42/index.xml?section=topstories
[font face=Serif][font size=5]'A better path' toward projecting, planning for rising seas on a warmer Earth[/font]

Posted April 3, 2013; 12:30 p.m.
by Morgan Kelly, Office of Communications

[font size=3]More useful projections of sea level are possible despite substantial uncertainty about the future behavior of massive ice sheets, according to Princeton University researchers.

In two recent papers in the journals Nature Climate Change and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the researchers present a probabilistic assessment of the Antarctic contribution to 21st-century sea-level change. Their methodology folds observed changes and models of different complexity into unified projections that can be updated with new information. This approach provides a consistent means to integrate the potential contribution of both continental ice sheets — Greenland and Antarctica — into sea-level rise projections.



"The paper projected a 95th percentile ice-mass loss equal to a 13-centimeter (5.1-inch) increase in sea level by 2100; other estimates provide upper bounds reaching up to 60 centimeters (roughly 23.5 inches), but with no quantification of probability. This paper suggests that most earlier projections either overestimated Antarctica's possible contribution to sea-level rise; implied physical changes inconsistent with underlying methodological assumptions; or, assume an extremely low risk tolerance.

…[/font][/font]

http://www.pnas.org/content/110/9/3264.abstract
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1845.html
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»'A better path' toward pr...