Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Crosspost from Good Reads: "Why we will finish eating the planet" (Original Post) GliderGuider Feb 2013 OP
Y2K, the Mayan Calendar, and now this. wtmusic Feb 2013 #1
Who gets the last bite? GliderGuider Feb 2013 #2
A Brief History of Birth Control kristopher Feb 2013 #3
Thanks for the time line. GliderGuider Feb 2013 #5
And who says infrastructure determinists don't have a sense of humor? Iterate Feb 2013 #7
I must hate humanity because I've got no warm feelings about this Lockheed fusion project... hunter Feb 2013 #4
There is only one way to deal with this feeling ... meditation. GliderGuider Feb 2013 #6

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
1. Y2K, the Mayan Calendar, and now this.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:26 PM
Feb 2013

Why do you think everything's going to be tied up in such a neat little knot?

Who gets the last bite?

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
2. Who gets the last bite?
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 03:51 PM
Feb 2013

Probably a bacterium of some sort, billions of years from now.

I don't make any predictions about what's going to happen. It's just that this framework explains everything that has happened or is happening with a parsimony, coherence and elegance I've never seen before. Occam makes a pretty good razor.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. A Brief History of Birth Control
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 05:49 PM
Feb 2013

A Brief History of Birth Control
Prior to any developed methods of birth control, women had to rely on male withdrawal, and on crude infanticide and abortion for backup.

3000 B.C. — Condoms made from such materials as fish bladders, linen sheaths, and animal intestines.

1500— First spermicides introduced which used condoms made from linen cloth sheaths and soaked in a chemical solution and dried before using.

1838— Condoms and diaphragms made from vulcanized rubber.

1873— The Comstock Act passed in the United States prohibiting advertisements, information, and distribution of birth control and allowing the postal service to confiscate birth control sold through the mail.

1916—Margaret Sanger opens first birth control clinic in the United States. The next year she was deemed guilty of “maintaining a public nuisance” and sentenced to jail for 30 days. Once released, she re-opened her clinic and continued to persevere through more arrests and prosecutions.

1938—In a case involving Margaret Sanger, a judge lifted the federal ban on birth control, ending the Comstock era. Diaphragms became a popular method of birth control.

1950—While in her 80s, Sanger underwrote the research necessary to create the first human birth control pill. She raised $150,000 for the project, and in 1960 the first oral contraceptive, Enovid, was marketed in the United States as invented by Frank Colton.

1965—The Supreme Court (in Griswold v. Connecticut) established the right of married couples to use birth control as protected in the Constitution as a “right to privacy.” However, millions of unmarried women in 26 states were still denied birth control.

1960s—Intrauterine devices (IUDs) first manufactured and marketed in the United States.

Late 1960s—Feminists challenged the safety of oral contraceptives (“the Pill”) as a result of confirmed serious health risks associated with it. Successful efforts led by feminist groups and consumer activists, along with well-publicized congressional hearings, led to modifications of the Pill.

1972— The Supreme Court (in Baird v. Eisenstadt) legalized birth control for all citizens of this country, irrespective of marital status.

1975—The Dalkon Shield, a popular IUD, recalled under charges that it had caused infertility in thousands of users. Although other IUD designs were not implicated, all IUDs were taken off the market under fear of litigation.

1980s and 1990s—Hormonal birth control methods expanded to include implants and injectables. Low-dose pills were introduced.

1992—Emergency contraception became more widely available as a result of public awareness campaign.

1990s—Rapid expansion in method availability and improvements in safety and effectiveness, including introduction of the hormonal patch, vaginal ring, new injectables, single rod implants, and transcervical female sterilization.

2000s—Female condoms are introduced.

Today—More research is needed in woman-controlled methods that protect against STIs.

Today—Barriers to access to reliable contraception remain for women world-wide.

ETA link http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/book/companion.asp?id=18&compID=53

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
5. Thanks for the time line.
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 02:57 AM
Feb 2013

Do you think birth control is going to reverse population growth any time soon?

The implication of infrastructural determinism is that contraception will only become widely accepted when a culture doesn't want/need more people as much. That's precisely what rising levels of technology accomplish. Just as higher levels of technology created the infrastructural prerequisites for women's suffrage and the abolition of slavery, they have created it for contraception as well. I'm pretty sure now that the MPP is the motive force underlying infrastructural determinism, and as a result "powers" the entire cultural engine.

Here's an interesting graph that plots technology level against birth rate:



A nice power law trend - higher tech gives lower birth rates. The MPP and infrastructural determinism at work.

And thanks so much for introducing me to Harris. He and Odum have completely changed my outlook on the world.

Iterate

(3,020 posts)
7. And who says infrastructure determinists don't have a sense of humor?
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 05:37 AM
Feb 2013

I did get a chuckle out of that, but maybe it's just me.

If you want more fun, just lie in wait for the assertion that Mao caused China's population stabilization with his family policy. That one's easy. The same results have universally occurred in cultures far removed. So much for top-down policy.*

*That's not an excuse for lack of leadership. Leadership is in a different category altogether.

hunter

(38,313 posts)
4. I must hate humanity because I've got no warm feelings about this Lockheed fusion project...
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 02:14 AM
Feb 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2416520

I said it would be like a meth addict winning the lottery and nothing good will come of it.

If we can't control our fossil fuel use we'll simply use cheap fusion energy to turn things like tar sands or coal into cheap gasoline and disposable plastic crap, and turn rain forests into paper, furniture, disposable diapers and wood decking.

It's not hard to imagine a world where the outside air is hot and unfit to breathe, but the fusion powered air conditioners of the upper classes clean it up and cool it down, and the water is unfit to drink, but the fusion powered water purifiers of the upper classes purify it, and the food of the upper classes is grown under lights in the antarctic winters or the long sun of the antarctic summer...

... while the rest of us live short brutal lives in an earthly hell.

Yep, I can't wait. The future's so bright, I gotta wear shades.
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
6. There is only one way to deal with this feeling ... meditation.
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 03:49 AM
Feb 2013

Meditation ... And Xanax ... Um, two - there are just two ways to deal with this feeling. Meditation and Xanax ... And bourbon ... Uh, three - there are just three ways to deal with this feeling. Meditation, Xanax and bourbon ... And morphine...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Crosspost from Good Reads...