Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 07:41 PM Feb 2013

(California) In-state oil fields don't all meet standard (some “dirtier” than tar sands)

http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/In-state-oil-fields-don-t-all-meet-standard-4267131.php
[font face=Serif][font size=5]In-state oil fields don't all meet standard[/font]

David R. Baker
Published 5:50 pm, Sunday, February 10, 2013

[font size=3]Environmentalists often call oil from Canada's tar sands the dirtiest fuel on Earth, because the complex process of extracting it spews huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the air.

But by that standard, some of the crude oil pumped in California is just as dirty. In a few cases, it's even worse.

Several California oil fields produce just as much carbon dioxide per barrel of oil as the tar sands do, state data show. A handful of fields yield even more.

All of them are fields that have been pumped for years and now need injections of steam to squeeze out more oil. Power plants create the steam, releasing greenhouse gases in the process. The gases build up in the atmosphere, slowly warming the globe.

…[/font][/font]
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»(California) In-state oil...