The 14 Fossil-Fuel Projects Poised to F*ck up the Climate
http://www.alternet.org/environment/14-fossil-fuel-projects-poised-fck-climate
In a justly famous Rolling Stone piece, Bill McKibben popularized the notion of Global Warmings Terrifying New Math. We have a carbon budget, between now and 2050, of roughly 565 gigatons of carbon dioxide. If we emit more than that we are likely to exceed the 2 degree Celsius target agreed to in the Copenhagen Accord. (As Thomas Lovejoy notes in clear-eyed and essential piece in The New York Times yesterday, 2 degrees seems nightmarish as it is.)
According to the Carbon Tracker Initiative, the amount of CO2 represented by the worlds proven fossil fuel reserves is 2,795 gigatons. Heres the problem, in math terms: 2,795 > 565
If we want a reasonable hope of hitting our 2 degree target, we have to leave about 80 percent of the known fossil fuels in the ground.
That is indeed terrifying math, but it may become slightly less so as it becomes more specific and concrete. (It is always helpful to break a large task into component parts.) Toward that end, I saw some fascinating new work from the research consultancy Ecofys. Commissioned by Greenpeace, it attempts to rank the most dangerous fossil-fuel projects currently being planned.