Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumClimate scientist disowned by Newt Gingrich speaks out over book spat
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/06/climate-scientist-newt-gingrich-book-chapter?newsfeed=true[font face=Times, Serif][font size=5]Climate scientist disowned by Newt Gingrich speaks out over book spat[/font]
[font size=4]Katharine Hayhoe says the dumping of her chapter from Gingrich's book following rightwing pressure came as a surprise[/font]
Suzanne Goldenberg
guardian.co.uk, Friday 6 January 2012 06.14 EST
[font size=3]A US climate scientist at the centre of a row over Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich's stance on climate change has spoken out for the first time, condemning the polarisation of the issue.
Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech University, had written a chapter for Gingrich's upcoming book of essays on the environment. The chapter was aimed at climate sceptics, and those who fear it will cost too much to deal with climate change, but it was ditched by the presidential candidate after the book came under attack by rightwing talk show host Rush Limbaugh. Gingrich, desperate to shore up his conservative credentials, said of the chapter at a recent campaign event: "That's not going to be in the book. We didn't know that they were doing that and we told them to kill it."
In her first extensive comment on the matter, Hayhoe told the Guardian she condemned the polarisation of a crucial global concern. "I really, really deplore the politicisation and polarisation of this issue. There are these increasingly unprincipled attempts to polarise the science when the science is fact like the sky is blue, the grass is green and the temperature of our planet is increasing."
The decision to drop her contribution arrived as a complete shock to Hayhoe, who was told in a 7 December that email her chapter had been accepted without major changes. Days later, the chapter was on the scrap heap.
[/font][/font]
[font size=4]Katharine Hayhoe says the dumping of her chapter from Gingrich's book following rightwing pressure came as a surprise[/font]
Suzanne Goldenberg
guardian.co.uk, Friday 6 January 2012 06.14 EST
[font size=3]A US climate scientist at the centre of a row over Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich's stance on climate change has spoken out for the first time, condemning the polarisation of the issue.
Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech University, had written a chapter for Gingrich's upcoming book of essays on the environment. The chapter was aimed at climate sceptics, and those who fear it will cost too much to deal with climate change, but it was ditched by the presidential candidate after the book came under attack by rightwing talk show host Rush Limbaugh. Gingrich, desperate to shore up his conservative credentials, said of the chapter at a recent campaign event: "That's not going to be in the book. We didn't know that they were doing that and we told them to kill it."
In her first extensive comment on the matter, Hayhoe told the Guardian she condemned the polarisation of a crucial global concern. "I really, really deplore the politicisation and polarisation of this issue. There are these increasingly unprincipled attempts to polarise the science when the science is fact like the sky is blue, the grass is green and the temperature of our planet is increasing."
The decision to drop her contribution arrived as a complete shock to Hayhoe, who was told in a 7 December that email her chapter had been accepted without major changes. Days later, the chapter was on the scrap heap.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 690 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate scientist disowned by Newt Gingrich speaks out over book spat (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Jan 2012
OP
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1. rush -- the true king of the republican party
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)2. The oil industry and the 1% crafted the teabagger message to talk to the stupid(s)
I will kick this thread here.