Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:25 AM Jan 2013

Rep. Ed Markey Questions DOE’s Radioactive Recycling Proposal

Jan. 11, 2013 --

Contact: Eben Burnham-Snyder, Rep. Ed Markey, 202-225-2836

Radioactive Scrap Metal Could be Turned into Consumer Products

WASHINGTON (January 11, 2013) – A Department of Energy proposal to allow up to 14,000 metric tons of its radioactive scrap metal to be recycled into consumer products was called into question today by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) due to concerns over public health. In a letter sent to DOE head Steven Chu, Rep. Markey expressed “grave concerns” over the potential of these metals becoming jewelry, cutlery, or other consumer products that could exceed healthy doses of radiation without any knowledge by the consumer. DOE made the proposal to rescind its earlier moratorium on radioactive scrap metal recycling in December, 2012.

The proposal follows an incident from 2012 involving Bed, Bath & Beyond stores in America recalling tissue holders made in India that were contaminated with the radio-isotope cobalt-60. Those products were shipped to 200 stores in 20 states. In response to that incident, a Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesperson advised members of the public to return the products even though the amount of contamination was not considered to be a health risk.

“The public concerns associated with such a proposal cannot be understated,” writes Rep. Markey to Secretary Chu. “If these metals are being released to companies who will subsequently manufacture new consumer products from them, DOE simply has no way to ensure that different samples are not aggregated into more highly radioactive products.”

MORE

The full letter can be found HERE.



fairewindsenergy·Published on Jan 15, 2013

http://www.fairewinds.org/
http://www.fairewinds.org/content/repairs-four-nuclear-reactors-are-so-expens...
http://www.fairewinds.org/donations

Fairewinds examines continuing problems at four US nuclear reactors, each of which have been shutdown for more than two years. Upstream dam failures continue to plague Ft. Calhoun, steam generator tube failures at San Onofre jeopardized Los Angeles. Crystal River's containment repairs burden Floridians with excessive costs. Finally, Arnie examines a new proposal by the Department of Energy to melt radioactive scrap metal and reuse it in consumer goods like knives and forks.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Ed Markey Questions DOE’s Radioactive Recycling Proposal (Original Post) DeSwiss Jan 2013 OP
Paranoia knows no bounds. FBaggins Jan 2013 #1
''It makes no sense to create nuclear waste..... DeSwiss Jan 2013 #2
Only applies to metal with surface (residue) radioactive contamination. wtmusic Jan 2013 #3
I'm not sure that's possible. FBaggins Jan 2013 #4
It's OK ... Nihil Jan 2013 #5

FBaggins

(26,760 posts)
1. Paranoia knows no bounds.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jan 2013

For some people... any amount of radiation (no matter how tiny) is dangerous.

The reality is that one of the easier ways of dealing with "waste" is to recognize what the word means and only use it where appropriate. It makes no sense to artificially create "nuclear waste" by regulations that forbid the productive use of materials that are no more radioactive than many household products that we live with every day.

Shall we ban brick homes? Granite countertops? Low-sodium salt? Antique glassware?

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
3. Only applies to metal with surface (residue) radioactive contamination.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:07 PM
Jan 2013

Metal with volumetric contamination is still prohibited.

Answer: clean it off, use it again.

(Because Arnie's Fukushima star is losing its luster, he's resorting to extreme measures. Pitiful.)

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
5. It's OK ...
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:32 AM
Jan 2013

... the media & politicians will just blame it on a mixture of low Chinese quality
standards and fallout from Fukushima ...


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Rep. Ed Markey Questions ...