Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 05:20 PM Dec 2012

update on YNP wolf hunt kills

I posted the majority of this in general discussion but I may have erred with that decision.

Update: all wolves with collars for research purposes in the park have been killed outside the park in the current hunt. 3 were GPS collared and 7 were radio-telemtery (ping) collars.

Earlier post:

Attention to all who admire or are curious about wolves in the Rocky Mountains and Yellowstone NP:

I am sorry to inform everyone that all the hoopla about this paltry action taken by MTFW&P was all about the bad PR they got and nothing more. Many of we wolf advocates have fought nearly to the death about this for almost two decades and with little national attention (seriously, we are stalked and receive death threats and harassment and loss of employment for expressing our beliefs on a cause we feel is important in appropriate venues).

Now that 10% of the Yellowstone NP wolves have been killed in the hunts so far this season, it needs to be known that it isn't going to stop anything except that, like the "Crowder" event in MI yesterday, the PR machine will make this agency look better when they have done nothing in reality to relieve the issue except in the PR game. And it was in Wyoming that the majority of park wolves were killed by individuals sitting outside the park boundary with "calls" luring the wolves out of the park and then killing them. The quotas for hunting units are always filled on the perimeter of the parks where wolves live and are protected first.

Many have argued for a "buffer zone" around the entire perimeter of YNP to avoid this very issue... for years. So here's the map of the miniscule "closure" offered by MTFW&P after most of the wolves that would enter that area have already been killed:

http://fwp.mt.gov/hunting/planahunt/huntingGuides/wolf/closure.html

Mind you, neither Idaho or Wyoming have any intention of doing anything like this along their park borders.

It is also necessary to inform the general public that the main purpose (official excuse) for allowing the hunting of a species that has just recently been removed, illegally, from the ESA list was to let the wolf hating crowd "blow off some steam" by letting them kill some. That was so much BS that it makes one wonder what century these people live in. Letting these "hunters" kill wolves only encourages them to demand more killing and now trapping. There are a number of web sites that glorify the disrespectful maiming, torture and slow deaths of these amazing apex predators. And this issue has only received national attention because a well known wolf from the park was killed last week. About three million people come to YNP to see wolves and other wildlife in a natural setting each year and all three states benefit heavily from the revenue tourism brings.

As far as management policies in the three Rocky Mountain wolf DPS (reintroduced) states, Montana actually has the most reasonable (if you can call it that), Idaho and Wyoming are absolutely hostile toward the species and are attempting to kill them all even if they give lip service to the idea that the wolves will be placed back on the ESA list should they decline below 150 wolves per state. In the majority of the state of Wyoming there is a "shoot on sight" policy, year round. This is all due to the fact that they were reintroduced by the "goddam gubbamint" and wolves are something that can be taken out with guns.

Please pay attention to this issue as much as any of those regarding our rights as the removal of important species serves to further degrade our ability to survive by allowing the extractive industries to frack and dig up what's left of our publicly owned wild lands. They claim that in the absence of wildlife there is no reason to protect the land.

What can you do about it?

Call, email, tweet, FB the Congressional delegates and the state government officials of these three states and tell them that you will not be spending your vacation $$ in their state because of their wolf management policies. I urge everyone who cares about this to do so. You can find their contact info here:

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/contactingcongress.html

http://votesmart.org/

For wolf death tallies (overall population at time of delisting was approximately 1500 animals for these three states including park wolves):

Latest Posted Idaho Wolf Hunt Kill total: 114
Latest Posted Idaho Wolf Trapping Kill total: 6
Latest Posted Montana Wolf Hunt Kill Total: 87
Wyoming Wolf Kill Total: 58

Regional Total Reported Killed This Year: 265
Regional Total Reported Killed Since Delisting: 810

Source and for daily updates:
http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2012/12/05/briefly-noted-wildlife-news-stories-dec-5-2012-2/

It's the biosphere, stupid.

Thanks for reading my rant, I hope you contact the officials recommended above.

2naSalit

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
update on YNP wolf hunt kills (Original Post) 2naSalit Dec 2012 OP
MN is allowing wolf hunting this year BainsBane Dec 2012 #1
It seems that most 2naSalit Dec 2012 #3
Wolf murders do represent yet another environmental failure of the current administration villager Dec 2012 #2

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
1. MN is allowing wolf hunting this year
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 05:26 PM
Dec 2012

for the first time, and I believe they are allowing 800 to be killed. They claim the reason is to control the population, which has only recently come off the endangered species list.

I don't know what they do with the wolves once they kill them. Hunters eat deer and geese. But wolves?

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
3. It seems that most
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 07:07 PM
Dec 2012

serve as a reason for weenie waving, particularly online.

I am aware of those states in the Great Lakes having hunts too. They do have more wolves over there but far less problems with livestock. And those whom I know that live there say they don't get why they are being hunted in the wild lands when they are no problem to anyone. The one saving grace is that the tribes in the area aren't allowing hunting on their lands... what little they are in control of that is. And the authorities are suddenly concerned about nonhunters being shot, skewered with arrows and caught in traps and snares... and their dogs too. Out here in the Rockies, several dogs have been caught in traps already.

It's not a real brilliant policy and the numbers they are claiming to represent robust populations are horrendously unscientific.

It's all about teabagger politics, out here they are winning, mostly because of the piss poor education system that lacks funding in this neck o'the woods. Hard to believe it's the twenty first century out here.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
2. Wolf murders do represent yet another environmental failure of the current administration
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 05:33 PM
Dec 2012

This bunch seems to have little affinity for wilderness, or wildlife, alas.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»update on YNP wolf hunt k...