Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumResearchers Develop Effective Thermal Energy Storage System (for use with solar thermal power stns.)
http://newswire.uark.edu/article.aspx?id=19653[font face=Serif][font size=5]Researchers Develop Effective Thermal Energy Storage System[/font]
[font size=4]Concrete layer in tanks will increase safety and production, cut costs[/font]
Friday, November 09, 2012
[font size=3]FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. Engineering researchers at the University of Arkansas have developed a thermal energy storage system that will work as a viable alternative to current methods used for storing energy collected from solar panels. Incorporating the researchers design into the operation of a concentrated solar power plant will dramatically increase annual energy production while significantly decreasing production costs.
Current storage methods use molten salts, oils or beds of packed rock as media to conduct heat inside thermal energy storage tanks. Although these methods do not lose much of the energy collected by the panels, they are either expensive or cause damage to tanks. Specifically, the use of a packed rock, currently the most efficient and least expensive method, leads to thermal ratcheting, which is the stress caused to tank walls because of the expansion and contraction of storage tanks due to thermal cycling.
As an alternative to conventional methods, Selvam and doctoral student Matt Strasser designed and tested a structured thermocline system that uses parallel concrete plates instead of packed rock inside a single storage tank. Thermocline systems are units bodies of water, such as oceans and lakes, for example, but also smaller units that contain fluids or gas with distinct boundaries separating layers that have different temperatures. The plates were made from a special mixture of concrete developed by Micah Hale, associate professor of civil engineering. The mixture has survived temperatures of up to 600 degrees Celsius, or 1,112 degrees Fahrenheit. The storage process takes heat, collected in solar panels, and then transfers the heat through steel pipes into the concrete, which absorbs the heat and stores it until it can be transferred to a generator.
Modeling results showed the concrete plates conducted heat with an efficiency of 93.9 percent, which is higher than the Department of Energys goal and only slightly less than the efficiency of the packed-bed method. Tests also confirmed that the concrete layers conducted heat without causing damage to materials used for storage. In addition, energy storage using the concrete method cost only $0.78 per kilowatt-hour, far below the Department of Energys goal of achieving thermal energy storage at a cost of $15 per kilowatt-hour.
[/font][/font]
[font size=4]Concrete layer in tanks will increase safety and production, cut costs[/font]
Friday, November 09, 2012
[font size=3]FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. Engineering researchers at the University of Arkansas have developed a thermal energy storage system that will work as a viable alternative to current methods used for storing energy collected from solar panels. Incorporating the researchers design into the operation of a concentrated solar power plant will dramatically increase annual energy production while significantly decreasing production costs.
Current storage methods use molten salts, oils or beds of packed rock as media to conduct heat inside thermal energy storage tanks. Although these methods do not lose much of the energy collected by the panels, they are either expensive or cause damage to tanks. Specifically, the use of a packed rock, currently the most efficient and least expensive method, leads to thermal ratcheting, which is the stress caused to tank walls because of the expansion and contraction of storage tanks due to thermal cycling.
As an alternative to conventional methods, Selvam and doctoral student Matt Strasser designed and tested a structured thermocline system that uses parallel concrete plates instead of packed rock inside a single storage tank. Thermocline systems are units bodies of water, such as oceans and lakes, for example, but also smaller units that contain fluids or gas with distinct boundaries separating layers that have different temperatures. The plates were made from a special mixture of concrete developed by Micah Hale, associate professor of civil engineering. The mixture has survived temperatures of up to 600 degrees Celsius, or 1,112 degrees Fahrenheit. The storage process takes heat, collected in solar panels, and then transfers the heat through steel pipes into the concrete, which absorbs the heat and stores it until it can be transferred to a generator.
Modeling results showed the concrete plates conducted heat with an efficiency of 93.9 percent, which is higher than the Department of Energys goal and only slightly less than the efficiency of the packed-bed method. Tests also confirmed that the concrete layers conducted heat without causing damage to materials used for storage. In addition, energy storage using the concrete method cost only $0.78 per kilowatt-hour, far below the Department of Energys goal of achieving thermal energy storage at a cost of $15 per kilowatt-hour.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 657 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Researchers Develop Effective Thermal Energy Storage System (for use with solar thermal power stns.) (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Nov 2012
OP
FogerRox
(13,211 posts)1. 78 cents per KW hour
I'd like to see a 20 yr levelized cost of operation figure. 78 cents is nice, under a dollar, but can storage be done for 10 cents?