Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 01:11 PM Sep 2012

California High-Speed Rail Environmental Impact Review Passes Muster

http://wepartypatriots.com/wp/2012/09/24/california-high-speed-rail-environmental-impact-review-passes-muster/




Last Wednesday, the Federal Railroad Administration approved construction on the $69 billion high-speed rail line that will someday roll through California’s central valley.

Two months after receiving approval from the state legislature and Gov. Jerry Brown, the project passed its environmental impact review and inched one step closer to fruition. However, as has happened at every step along the way, the project is expecting to face more lawsuits from those who believe it is environmentally unsound.

The 41-page impact review showed that there will be “significant” negative impacts, but still deemed the project worthwhile. Private construction firms will now have until November to bid on the first $2 billion contract that will connect Merced to Fresno. It will take until Spring for the winning contractor to get together blueprints and workers for the project.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California High-Speed Rail Environmental Impact Review Passes Muster (Original Post) xchrom Sep 2012 OP
Kick! patrice Sep 2012 #1
Another money pit for California taxpayers demosincebirth Sep 2012 #2
It really doesn't pass the sanity check ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #3
Hooterville, Petticoat Junction, Gotham City. tinrobot Sep 2012 #4
My concern is that is the only place rails will be laid. ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #6
If the goal is to create a public transportation system that will reduce fossil fuel use XemaSab Sep 2012 #7
They sure would ride it... and add Los Angeles to that list. tinrobot Sep 2012 #8
Agree. demosincebirth Sep 2012 #9
From the picture, and experiences of past, I can only say; ... CRH Sep 2012 #5

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
3. It really doesn't pass the sanity check
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 03:12 PM
Sep 2012

HS rail is a really good thing. However, by going between Hooterville and Petticoat Junction, there will not be nearly enough traffic to sustain it. The right answer was to swallow hard and have two major anchors. Political cowardice at its worst.

tinrobot

(10,903 posts)
4. Hooterville, Petticoat Junction, Gotham City.
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 05:57 PM
Sep 2012

The plans will take it to the big cities, but you gotta lay the first rail somewhere, and Hooterville is a much cheaper place to start.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
6. My concern is that is the only place rails will be laid.
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 08:45 PM
Sep 2012

And if that is the case its damn near fraudulent.

The CA Pols did not have it in them to do the hard choices...typical

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
7. If the goal is to create a public transportation system that will reduce fossil fuel use
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 08:59 PM
Sep 2012

then the money would be better spent expanding BART.

Pop it up to Santa Rosa, over to Fairfield, out to Livermore, and down to Gilroy, with plans to take it to Monterey, Santa Cruz, Stockton, Davis, and Sacramento.

People would ride the hell out of that.

tinrobot

(10,903 posts)
8. They sure would ride it... and add Los Angeles to that list.
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 09:39 PM
Sep 2012

If Los Angeles expanded rail/subways to the Valley, the airports, beach cities, and a few other key areas, we'd have a very functional system.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»California High-Speed Rai...