Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
behold: ice cover August 4th, 2012 vs 2007 (Original Post) phantom power Aug 2012 OP
A little expert analysis would be useful. Scuba Aug 2012 #1
I'll give you my non-expert analysis phantom power Aug 2012 #2
The bar on the left will give some info. alfredo Aug 2012 #3
I'm not an expert, but here's what I know: 2007 set the record for lowest ice extent. emmadoggy Aug 2012 #9
Slight correction: XemaSab Aug 2012 #10
Thanks for the clarification. emmadoggy Aug 2012 #12
Any time XemaSab Aug 2012 #14
So, if my 100% amateur eyes are right... truebrit71 Aug 2012 #4
My reading of the map is that about 2/3 of the ice is 60% coverage or less phantom power Aug 2012 #5
There's a huge storm right now XemaSab Aug 2012 #7
I think we are going to see Something New this year phantom power Aug 2012 #8
Yeah, when the storm is over, the scientific community is going to be agape. joshcryer Aug 2012 #15
I went to a presentation by a Canadian ice scientist about this time in 2007 GliderGuider Aug 2012 #17
oh yes XemaSab Aug 2012 #19
I've been watching and it is crazy scary this year. emmadoggy Aug 2012 #6
Day 216 XemaSab Aug 2012 #11
Yikes. nt emmadoggy Aug 2012 #13
Insane. joshcryer Aug 2012 #16
Wait?? Half a MILLION lower?? truebrit71 Aug 2012 #21
The projection is 2014/2015 XemaSab Aug 2012 #22
Remember when they said that wouldn't happen until 2035-2050? truebrit71 Aug 2012 #23
2013 is the earliest I was thinking. joshcryer Aug 2012 #24
Watching this happen is starting to make me physically sick, but I can't stop. Systematic Chaos Aug 2012 #18
All that red is where the ice has disintergrated into slush. Odin2005 Aug 2012 #20

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
2. I'll give you my non-expert analysis
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:36 PM
Aug 2012

2012 is on the left. I'll bet a non-expert case of beer that anything not colored purple will be gone by mid September. And by beer, I mean some Double Oaked Bastard, or anything equally unhealthy. And by "bet" I mean I promise to drink it all.

emmadoggy

(2,142 posts)
9. I'm not an expert, but here's what I know: 2007 set the record for lowest ice extent.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:16 PM
Aug 2012

The purples and pinks are thicker, more solid ice. The reds, greens, yellows are thinner, slushier ice and ice that is most likely going to be gone or nearly gone by mid-September when the re-freeze typically begins. Which means that it is highly likely that we are going to be smashing the record low from 2007 - at least to my eyes. I have never seen such a small area of purple/pink before.

The less thick, old ice we have in the arctic, the easier the ice melts the next summer. The more the ice melts, the more dark water we have to absorb more of the sun's heat, thus melting even more ice and warming the earth even more.


XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
10. Slight correction:
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:26 PM
Aug 2012

The color doesn't have to do with thickness but rather the amount of solid ice versus open water.

You could have ice ten feet thick that has a puddle on it and it would read as open water. Some of the lighter purple and red within the main pack is probably solid ice with some surface melting. However, most of the red areas towards the top and right of the image are just loose floes.

emmadoggy

(2,142 posts)
12. Thanks for the clarification.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:49 PM
Aug 2012

I didn't explain it very well. As I said, I'm no expert. The E/E forum has been the extent of my education on this stuff - and I have learned a LOT, but most of the technical, science-y stuff is way over my head. I do my best to make sense of it all, lol.


 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
4. So, if my 100% amateur eyes are right...
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 12:49 PM
Aug 2012

It is slightly larger in area, but much thinner in 2012 than 2007, yes? It also appears that there is clear water from Alaska all the way to Nova Scotia...

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
7. There's a huge storm right now
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:09 PM
Aug 2012

but if you click the grey areas between the cloud bands and select "250m" for pixel size you can see that most of the area that isn't purple is just chunks of briny slush. There's still some solid ice, but it's weaker and thinner than it was in 2007.

http://lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/?mosaic=Arctic.2012217.terra.4km

(The storm up there is predicted to wreak real havoc on the remaining ice. The next few days could be brutal.)

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
15. Yeah, when the storm is over, the scientific community is going to be agape.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 10:01 PM
Aug 2012

They simply will not know how to relate the magnitude of this event to the public at large.

I hope the media picks it up.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
17. I went to a presentation by a Canadian ice scientist about this time in 2007
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 10:27 PM
Aug 2012

He'd just gotten back from an Arctic trip on the icebreaker Amundsen. His eyed were bugged out and his hair was on fire. He used the word "unprecedented" about 8 times in the 45 minute talk. I'd love to talk to him again at the end of September this year! The rest of this week is going to be um interesting.

emmadoggy

(2,142 posts)
6. I've been watching and it is crazy scary this year.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:04 PM
Aug 2012

I have never seen such a small patch of pink/purple. And after reading this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/112721316
it sounds like most of that slush is toast and then some.

An ice free arctic is coming very rapidly.




XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
11. Day 216
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:44 PM
Aug 2012

In 1980, 1982, 1983, 1986, and 1996, the ice on this day was about 6.5 million square kilometers.

2006: 4.8941
2007: 3.98794
2008: 4.32312
2009: 4.55299
2010: 4.21931
2011: 3.94001
2012: 3.55623

Even though the lines on CT look really close together, we're almost half a million square kilometers lower than we've ever been before and the weather prediction is for serious melting and dispersal this week.

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/arctic.sea.ice.interactive.html

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
21. Wait?? Half a MILLION lower??
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:01 AM
Aug 2012

Wow...when I told folks we would see ice-free summers THIS decade I was thinking post-2015....not possibly THIS year....WOW....

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
23. Remember when they said that wouldn't happen until 2035-2050?
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 04:15 PM
Aug 2012

Man oh man are we on a different schedule now...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»behold: ice cover August...