Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nathanael

(398 posts)
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 05:21 PM Jun 2012

Major Pipeline Oil Leak Spills Thousands of Barrels into Alberta River

A leaking oil pipeline has spilled 475,000 litres of sour oil in the Red Deer River and a nearby creek in Sundre, Alberta.

The spill was first identified on Thursday night when residents living just north of Sundre phoned in reports of smelling rotten eggs -- a telltale sign of sour gas or oil.

http://www.energyboom.com/policy/major-pipeline-oil-leak-spills-thousands-barrels-alberta-river

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CrispyQ

(36,509 posts)
3. "When there is a solar spill, it's called a beautiful day!"
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 05:28 PM
Jun 2012

I saw that somewhere & it made me smile.

turtlerescue1

(1,013 posts)
5. Having trouble with ability to be deluded.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 05:37 PM
Jun 2012

Or should that be diluted?

Does this one have an affiliation with some of the "boys"/brothers here? It's too bad the Earth can't bring a lawsuit, I mean Corporations are considered people, why not This Baby Blue Planet?

liam_laddie

(1,321 posts)
6. Headline is a bit misleading
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 06:24 PM
Jun 2012

475,000 litres is about 2,988 barrels (at 42 gallons per oil barrel, the standard used by most producers.)
Granted that 3,000 "is" thousands, but the 475,000 jumps out; switching the word "litres" to "barrels" way overstates the volume, probably an innocent error.
For example, this spill is equivalent to about one-third of the capacity of a typical 9,000 gallon, two-axle tanker trailer...
the type you see refilling the below-ground tanks at your local filling station. Any spill, however small, is always a disaster for the environment. Still a lot of crap in the river. Sad.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
8. Uh, 2988 barrels is far more then what any tanker truck can carry.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jun 2012

A very large tanker can be 100 barrels, not 3000.

liam_laddie

(1,321 posts)
12. Mea maxima culpa, Arctic Dave.
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jun 2012

You are absolutely correct; my bad. Can't blame my calculator. The spill estimate is about 2990 bbls., or over 125,000 gallons. That's about (14) 9,000 gallon trailers-full. A BIG spill; wonder how long that much oil was flowing. Thanks for catching that. A big two-axle tanker trailer holds a bit more than 200 bbls. or 8400 US gallons.
Also, I agree with AtheistCrusader's note; in the 1980's I was dimensioning parts in both English & Metric (SI) systems. Metric is better.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
11. The headline is not misleading. The united states is in the dark ages.
Sat Jun 9, 2012, 02:17 AM
Jun 2012

Story is about Alberta Canada. They use Metric up there. Like the rest of the civilized world.

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
7. Boy that's going to raise havoc with the Feds. push to get that pipeline from Alberta
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 06:49 PM
Jun 2012

to Prince Rupert, BC. Maybe this is just the thing the environmentalists needed to stop this thing.

OnlinePoker

(5,725 posts)
9. It's not Prince Rupert, it's Kitimat
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 10:13 PM
Jun 2012

Deep water port but narrow channel to get into it. There is (was?) a major aluminum smelter there.

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
10. That's even worse huh? I would suspect that the Aboriginals will be against that, big time.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 10:20 PM
Jun 2012

All British Colombians should be against this. As I understand it, there is really nothing in this for BC.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Major Pipeline Oil Leak S...