Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWhy Is the Government Killing Bald Eagles?
http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/05/wildlife-services-sacramento-beet's a sad fact of life in wildlife management: Every now and then, wild animals have to be killed for the sake of ecological or agricultural protection. "Culling," as it's known, is often a last resort and is usually carried out with a grim sense of necessary duty. After all, most wildlife professionals aren't big on the idea of killing wildlife.
Right?
An unsettling new investigation by The Sacramento Bee found that the federal Wildlife Services agency, an obscure bureau within the USDA tasked with "resolving wildlife conflicts," has in the last decade accidentally killed over 50,000 animals that posed no threat to people or the environment (in addition to nearly a million coyotes killed intentionally). The execution roster would make John Muir roll over in his grave: wolverines, river otters, migratory shorebirds, bald and golden eagles, and more than a thousand dogs (averaging eight a month!), including family pets. According to the Bee:
'In most cases, [employees of the agency] have officially revealed little or no detail about where the creatures were killed, or why. But a Bee investigation has found the agency's practices to be indiscriminate, at odds with science, inhumane and sometimes illegal... because lethal control stirs strong emotions, Wildlife Services prefers to operate in the shadows.
"We pride ourselves on our ability to go in and get the job done quietly without many people knowing about it," said Dennis Orthmeyer, acting state director of Wildlife Services in California.'
Officially, Wildlife Services exists to take care of things like aggressive bears, coyotes that eat a rancher's sheep, geese that won't get off the tarmac, etc. But the Bee reports that the methods the agency uses, like traps with spring-loaded poison cartridges, leave a grisly wake of bycatch, sometimes of federally protected species, that has been deliberately hushed up by top officials. Even people are at risk: 18 employees and "several members of the public" have been exposed to cyanide from the traps.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)When we lived in the SD Black Hills this was used by the "state trapper". We were surrounded by state forest but a neighbor about 5 miles away was having problems with coyotes killing calves as soon as they were born. He called us to let us know the state trapper was setting these out. I went to see what it looked like. It was in a road killed deer and my question at the time, was what about the bald eagles. I was told that is a problem because they could be poisoned by it. We did have lots of bald eagles around and yes they would eat carrion.
Here in the Nebraska we also have a state trapper and I do not know if this is use but I would bet it is.
Last year he did ask to come on our property to shoot coyotes that again were killing newborn calves before they even got up. I said yes but didn't think to ask if they use that poison trap here.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)An unemployed man gets a job placing the killing devices and the local ranchers think that something good is being done.
However, the coyotes proceed to breed at a faster rate to make up for it. Ranchers are a plague. I don't patronize them with my grocery dollars.
malakai2
(508 posts)Wolves also occur at a much lower population density than coyotes. It might be cheaper and more efficient to stop the shooting/trapping/poisoning program and just cut a check to ranchers for the smaller number of livestock lost to wolves than to coyotes.