Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,957 posts)
Sun Aug 9, 2020, 02:04 PM Aug 2020

Editorial: Debate regarding Snake River dams is far from over

It’s not water over the dam.

In other words, don’t assume the word “final” in three federal agencies’ Final Environmental Impact Statement regarding salmon and steelhead preservation strategies on the Columbia and Snake rivers has ended the debate over the fate of four dams on the lower Snake River in Eastern Washington.

At the end of last month, three federal agencies — the Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Power Administration and the Bureau of Reclamation, which oversee management of the Northwest’s hydroelectric dams — released their final analysis and recommendations on how best to preserve threatened and endangered runs of salmon and steelhead on the rivers.

For more than 20 years, environmentalists and regional tribes have advocated for river habitat enhancements, including the removal of the four Snake River dams built in the 1960s and 1970s between the Tri-Cities and the Washington-Idaho border. Removal of the dams is seen as the most effective way to save and rebuild declining runs of the fish on which tribal, sport and commercial fishing depend, as well as other endangered species, especially the state’s orca whales, which spend part of the year at the mouth of the Columbia feeding on salmon before returning to Salish Sea waters in Northwest Washington.

Currently, 13 runs of salmon are listed as endangered or threatened species; four of them return to the Snake River to end and begin their life cycle.

But the dams’ removal has been opposed by many who warn that the loss of the dams would bring a decrease in available electricity and higher costs for the region’s ratepayers and difficulties for Eastern Washington farmers who depend on the dams for irrigation and barge shipping.

-more-

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/editorial-debate-regarding-snake-river-dams-is-far-from-over/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Editorial: Debate regarding Snake River dams is far from over (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2020 OP
Rec'd for visibility yonder Aug 2020 #1
kickety kick abqtommy Aug 2020 #2
K&R 2naSalit Aug 2020 #3

2naSalit

(86,586 posts)
3. K&R
Sun Aug 9, 2020, 03:55 PM
Aug 2020

It's way overdue to undo the damage done by these dams. If the salmon, a keystone species, can;t return to their upland spawning grounds, it will destroy what's left of the forests. The only way phosphates and nitrates get to central Idaho from the ocean is via salmon bodies. Since the forests have been starved of these nutrients since the dams were built, we have given the forests aids, unable to fend of disease and vermin. Ridding the waterway of these dams would be one of the best major environmental moves we could make for most of the northern Rockies.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Editorial: Debate regardi...