Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThree Climategate Myths That Have Failed To Age Well
EDIT
The misunderstood 'trick'
One quote regularly mangled (most recently in a myth-filled Telegraph article, which was evaluated by the climate scientists at Climate Feedback as having very low scientific credibility) referred to using Mikes Nature trick
to hide the decline. The ellipses mask that two separate issues were being discussed in this hacked email. First, climate scientist Michael Manns Nature trick simply refers to adding temperature measurements from modern instruments to a chart illustrating indirect proxy temperature estimates (i.e., analyzing tree ring sizes) in the more distant past. The use of the word trick in the email was in the context of trick of the trade, not tricking the audience. If the latter were the case, the use of two different sources of data would not have been labeled as explicitly as possible in Manns scientific paper and subsequent reports.
Second, hiding the decline referred to the fact that indirect proxy temperature estimates from tree rings were known to be unreliable after about 1960. From about 1960 to 1990 they showed temperatures falling, whereas we know temperatures actually rose during that time.
Tree ring data matched other temperature records accurately prior to 1960 before diverging from the reliable instrumental record thereafter. Climate science research has linked this so-called divergence problem to increases in human-caused pollution in recent decades. The email in question was merely suggesting adding reliable instrumental temperature measurement data so that the chart being discussed didnt end with a segment of data showing a decline that was known to be inaccurate. So, in fact, the trick was an effort to give as accurate information as possible (rather than the opposite, as was repeatedly alleged).
A related quote (also included in the Telegraph article) claimed that climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck asserted that we have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP). This is a fabrication Overpeck actually said, I'm not the only one who would like to deal a mortal blow to the misuse of supposed warm period terms and myths in the literature. Overpeck was correct that the MWP is incorrectly referenced regularly. For example, the recent much-maligned Telegraph article went on to claim that the MWP (which roughly spanned the years 900 to 1300 AD) was even hotter than today, which is a relatively widespread myth. Numerous studies have reconstructed temperatures over the past several thousand years since Mann and colleagues published their paper in the scientific journal Nature in 1998. All have arrived at the same conclusion: that the MWP was at most a small blip in average global temperatures and that current temperatures are significantly hotter.
EDIT
And so forth . . .
https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/11/18/3-climategate-myths-have-not-aged-well
TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)That we have to waste time convincing dumbasses this is real when we could be using that time to do something to fight climate change.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)we dont have to worry