US Court Weighs if Climate Change Violates Children's Rights

[Rhiannon12866]

Federal judges are wrestling over whether climate change violates the rights of young people who have sued the U.S. government over the use of fossil fuels.

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — In a courtroom packed with environmental activists, federal judges wrestled Tuesday with whether climate change violates the constitutional rights of young people who have sued the U.S. government over the use of fossil fuels.

A Justice Department attorney warned three judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that allowing the case to go to trial would be unprecedented and open the doors to more lawsuits.

"This case would have earth-shattering consequences," Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark said.

He called the lawsuit "a direct attack on the separation of powers" and said the 21 young people who filed it want the courts to direct U.S. energy policy, instead of government officials.

The young people are pressing the government to stop promoting the use of fossil fuels, saying sources like coal and oil cause climate change and violate their Fifth Amendment rights to life, liberty and property.

The judges seemed to feel the enormity of the case, which the plaintiffs' lawyer compared in scope to the U.S. Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education ruling that mandated desegregation of schools in the 1950s.


Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2019-06-04/young-americans-lawsuit-on-climate-change-faces-big-hurdle



Supporters attend a rally Tuesday, June 4, 2019 for a group of young people who filed a lawsuit saying U.S. energy policies are causing climate change and hurting their future. The group faces a major hurdle Tuesday as lawyers for the Trump administration argue to stop the case from moving forward. in Portland, Ore. (AP Photo/Steve Dipaola)

[Duppers]

1. "Federal judges are wrestling ..."

Wrestling? Or wondering if they'll lose their jobs with the corporate thugs in charge?

U.S. energy policy has insured these young lives shall be cut short. They must win these cases.

[defacto7]

2. "This case would have earth-shattering consequences,"

How ironic. Arguing that fighting the use of fossil fuels whould have earth shattering consequences when not fighting the use of fossil fuels would have earth shattering consequences.