Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,617 posts)
Thu Mar 28, 2019, 02:23 PM Mar 2019

"The decline of coal plants has continued under President Trump."

David Fahrenthold Retweeted

‘That’s what happens when a big plant shuts down in a small town.’ The decline of coal plants has continued under President Trump. That means an ongoing shift toward cleaner energy, but also rough times for places like Adams County, Ohio. w/@StevenMufson



Health & Science
‘That’s what happens when a big plant shuts down in a small town.’

By Brady Dennis, Reporter focusing on environmental policy and public health issues, and Steven Mufson
March 28 at 12:52 PM

ADAMS COUNTY, Ohio — The barges floating down the Ohio River no longer deliver coal to the two power plants that have stood here for decades, twin sentinels looming over this rural county east of Cincinnati.

The boilers have sat idle since May, when both the J.M. Stuart and Killen power plants closed on the same day. They once provided about 700 jobs but now are among the latest casualties of a declining industry that has seen nearly half of the nation’s coal-fired plants close over the past decade.

The vanishing of coal plants from the American landscape began years ago, but it has persisted under President Trump, who came into office promising to revitalize the coal industry. He has rolled back environmental regulations meant to curb pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, installed a former coal lobbyist as head of the Environmental Protection Agency and tweeted in favor of keeping certain units operating. And yet, utilities have continued to shut down plants.

The main reason? Coal can’t compete against cheaper, cleaner alternatives, such as natural gas and solar and wind energy. ... More coal plant capacity disappeared during Trump’s first two years in office than during President Barack Obama’s entire first term, and the closures are set to continue in 2019 and beyond.
....

Stuart and Killen were among the 19 coal-fired plants to shut down across the country during 2018 — one of the largest waves of U.S. coal plant retirements ever in a single year. Stuart, which once had a staggering capacity of 2,318 megawatts, remains the largest U.S. coal plant ever to close its doors.
....


....

Brady Dennis is a national reporter for The Washington Post, focusing on the environment and public health issues. He previously spent years covering the nation’s economy. Dennis was a finalist for the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for a series of explanatory stories about the global financial crisis. Follow https://twitter.com/brady_dennis

Steven Mufson covers the business of climate change. Since joining The Washington Post in 1989, he has covered economic policy, China, diplomacy, energy and the White House. Earlier he worked for The Wall Street Journal in New York, London and Johannesburg. Follow https://twitter.com/StevenMufson
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The decline of coal plants has continued under President Trump." (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 OP
His beautiful coal's beauty is fading... Blue Owl Mar 2019 #1
Unfortunately, globally, coal burning has grown in the last 2 years. Up 0.7% in 2018. progree Mar 2019 #2
trump voting coal workers could keep their jobs by working for free, no benefits or retirements nt msongs Mar 2019 #3
We are about to see Wellstone ruled Mar 2019 #4

progree

(10,919 posts)
2. Unfortunately, globally, coal burning has grown in the last 2 years. Up 0.7% in 2018.
Thu Mar 28, 2019, 03:19 PM
Mar 2019

Last edited Thu Mar 28, 2019, 04:51 PM - Edit history (2)

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127125309
In particular, a fleet of relatively young coal plants located in Asia, with decades to go on their lifetimes, led the way toward a record for emissions from coal fired power plants — exceeding 10 billion tons of carbon dioxide “for the first time,” the agency said. In Asia, “average plants are only 12 years old, decades younger than their average economic lifetime of around 40 years,” the agency found.


Sad, because actually world coal consumption was less in 2017 than at the peak reached in 2014. (It was up in 2017 over 2016, but still below the 2014 level) The 3rd graph at this link (the line graph on the right)

https://www.iea.org/coal2018/

shows world coal consumption from 2000 through 2016 and forecast through 2023 (I wonder if 2017 is forecast or final). Unfortunately it isn't updated for the number behind the 0.7% increase in 2018 in the above excerpt.

Anyway, in the graph, one can hover the mouse over any point and it will pop up the year and the Mtce (Millions of tonnes of coal equivalent --

https://www.iea.org/statistics/resources/unitconverter/
. . 100 Mtce = 70 Mtoe = 2.931 EJ (exajoules)

Another thing -- the 2017 point on this graph says "2017 Coal 2018 Forecast 5355 Mtce"

Forecast? I think they already have/had their final 2017 number, though this page isn't dated as to when it was created or updated.

the 2018 point on this graph says "2018 Coal 2018 Forecast 5408.55 Mtce" and is almost certainly a forecast at the time this page was created. And isn't the one that is being reported on by the above excerpt.

Some key points from the 2018 Coal report, MTCE = Million tonnes of coal equivalent (energy)

Year MTCE
2000 3299
2014 5610 (up 70.1% since 2000). The peak point on this graph
2016 5308 Local bottom - lowest point since 2010.
2017 5355 (forecast)
2018 5408.55 (forecast for sure, and not the number being reported in the excerpt above)

As can be seen, from the graph and these points, it rocketed from 2000 to 2014 then dipped a bit from 2014 to 2016 and is headed up again...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A whole nuther series of post can be written on: the increase in all fossil fuels (not just coal) consumption, and not just in the electric generation sector but all sectors (e.g. heating, transportation, industrial etc. as well). And the resulting GHG emissions increases (not just energy produced or consumed). And globally





 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
4. We are about to see
Thu Mar 28, 2019, 03:35 PM
Mar 2019

four Dirt Burners go off line this fall and by next Summer. Page Arizona,three Units,Sparks Nevada one plant,one of the dirtiest in the USA. That will leave only Rocky mountain power in Utah with their outdated Toxic nightmares.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"The decline of coal plan...