Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2019, 08:29 AM Mar 2019

How PG&E Ignored Fire Risks In Favor Of Profits - NYT

Tower 27/222 looms almost 100 feet tall in the Sierra Nevada foothills, a hunk of steel that has endured through 18 United States presidents. The transmission lines that it supports keep electricity flowing to much of California.

On the morning of Nov. 8, a live wire broke free of its grip. A power failure occurred on the line, affecting a single customer. But 15 minutes later, a fire was observed nearby. Within hours, flames engulfed the region, ultimately killing 85 and destroying the town of Paradise.

The equipment belonged to the state’s biggest utility, Pacific Gas and Electric. To the company’s critics, the tower and its vulnerability reflect a broken safety culture. Five of the 10 most destructive fires in California since 2015 have been linked to PG&E’s electrical network. Regulators have found that in many fires, PG&E violated state law or could have done more to make its equipment safer.

Long before the failure suspected in the Paradise fire, a company email had noted that some of PG&E’s structures in the area, known for fierce winds, were at risk of collapse. It reported corrosion of one tower so severe that it endangered crews trying to repair the tower. The company’s own guidelines put Tower 27/222 a quarter-century beyond its useful life — but the tower remained.

EDIT

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/18/business/pge-california-wildfires.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How PG&E Ignored Fire Risks In Favor Of Profits - NYT (Original Post) hatrack Mar 2019 OP
It's the same story everywhere, our aging infrastructure procon Mar 2019 #1

procon

(15,805 posts)
1. It's the same story everywhere, our aging infrastructure
Wed Mar 20, 2019, 10:13 AM
Mar 2019

is collapsing all around us. Are there regs that force PG&E to keep up with routine maintenance? Does the state inspect their transmission grid for compliance and safety?

Much of our network of infrastructure were built under the WPA during the Great Depression in the 30s, and another massive wave of building occurred post WWII in the 50s. We appropriated funds for construction, but no additional money, or regulations, for ongoing maintenance or upgrades. It's been piecemeal ever since, Politicians, who can always find money to throw at the military and gift to their favorite corporate donors and wealthy pals, balk when it comes to funding longterm projects
to replace these failing structures.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How PG&E Ignored Fire Ris...