Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumIonic Liquid Polymeric Membranes for the Separation of Carbon Dioxide From Nitrogen Streams.
The paper I'll discuss in this post is: Imidazolium-Based Copoly(Ionic Liquid) Membranes for CO2/N2 Separation ( Isabel M. Marrucho et al Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2019, 58 (5), pp 20172026)
I believe that it is extremely urgent to phase out fossil fuels, not in some far off "by 2050" or "by 2100" putative so called "renewable energy" nirvana that will never come, but now. It is not ethical or just to expect our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will be able to do what we ourselves cannot do or are too cheap to do, this after we have seriously destroyed most of the world's resources by surrendering them to entropy.
The technology to do this exists, but we must surrender our stupidity in order to use it. It's called "nuclear energy."
Early this week, several daily readings at the Mauna Loa carbon dioxide observatory recorded (momentarily) readings greater than 414 ppm. The weekly average, was 412.40 ppm, just shy (by 10 parts per billion) of the weekly average record set two weeks ago, 412.01 ppm. The unfortunate thing about this reading is that the consequences of the reading today will have effects years later, since the ocean is warming rapidly and because it also displays thermal inertia, it can only cool slowly.
Therefore it is urgent not only to stop dumping carbon dioxide and other dangerous fossil fuel wastes into the atmosphere will they kill directly as poisons as well as slowly as climate agents, but to begin, as quickly as possible to remove them from the air.
One avenue for capturing carbon dioxide is via the combustion of biomass, and capture of the exhaust.
This is best done by closed combustion in oxygen enriched atmospheres, a subject I discussed recently: On the combustion of biomass in oxygen enriched carbon dioxide atmospheres. (Well, it was interesting to write, in any case, even if it may have been unreadable.)
However, the production of oxyfuels requires a pure oxygen source, and energetically sustainable oxygen sources currently do not exist, since air separation is driven by electricity and in this country more and more electricity is being obtained by the combustion of dangerous fossil fuels than at any time in history. Oxygen cannot be made in a sustainable fashion unless it is made from the thermochemical splitting of water or carbon dioxide, and our ignorance has prevented us from moving forward with that, although the technology has been demonstrated at least on pilot scales.
The next best option is to capture carbon dioxide from the combustion of biomass in such a way as the serious pollutants, including but not limited to carbon dioxide are captured and put to use by reduction.
Hence my interest in the cited paper above, since a combustion stream is largely a mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
The paper concerns a class of materials that has been an intense area of research, "ionic liquids" which are salts of organic cations with organic anions (and sometimes inorganic ions) that can be liquid at room temperature but exhibit essentially no vapor pressure, and thus do not release fumes or easily catch fire.
In this case, materials featuring structures common to many ionic liquids are incorporated into polymers, this for the purpose of separating carbon dioxide.
From the introductory text of the paper:
In what concerns the use of ILs in membranes, two strategies deserve special attention: the use of an inert porous membrane to support ILs and the incorporation of ILs in a polymeric matrix. Supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) have been widely studied for CO2 separation as they offer a facile preparation methodology.18 Results using a large number of ILs show that SILMs is a very promising strategy, since high CO2 permeabilities and attractive permselectivities can be obtained. However, SILMs present a major drawback: their low stability under high trans-membrane pressures and high temperatures, due to the weak capillary forces that hold ILs within the pores. On the other hand, the incorporation of ILs in polymeric membranes, in which the IL is entrapped in the tight spaces between the polymer chains, has proven to be a successful approach, providing membranes with increased mechanical strength compared to SILMs. A large variety of polymers has been used to prepare polymer?IL composites, 19?21 but the most successful approach lays on the use of poly(ionic liquid)s (PILs),22,23 since they allow the incorporation of higher amounts of ILs, due to the large degree of strong ionic interactions between the IL and the PIL components. On top of that, neat PIL membranes possess higher CO2 sorption capacities than their corresponding IL monomers24 and present CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 similar or greater than those observed for SILMs.
What is under discussion are "PILS."
Here are some PILS referenced in the paper:
The caption:
The authors here make a new series of PILS
Here is some of the interesting organic chemistry by which the "PILS" in question are made:
The caption:
"CTA" here refers to "Chain Transfer Agent," an agent designed to control the size of polymers by trapping the reactive mechanistic intermediate during the polymerization reaction. Here the potassium salt of of ethyl xanathate is reacted with ethyl 2-bromopropionate to give 2-ethoxythiocarbonylsulfanyl-propionic acid ethyl ester.
The use of chain transfer agents in polymerization reactions is called "reversible addition?fragmentation chain transfer" (RAFT) polymerization.
Here is the synthesis of the "ionic liquid" portion of the polymer:
The caption:
The RAFT polymerization:
The caption:
Assembly of the final co-polymers:
The caption:
Note that several different polymers are described in this graphic, not just a single polymer.
The differing polymers were then cast into membranes by dissolving them in a mixture of acetone and a commercially available ionic liquid called [C2mim][NTf2], and then spread into petri dishes, where, upon drying they gave membranes.
Not all of the polymers could form membranes however. Some were brittle and broke; others simply would not spread properly:
The caption:
The authors write:
Some of the physical chemistry of measuring the properties of gas diffusion:
P = D × S (1)
The permeate flux of each gas (Ji) was determined experimentally using eq 2,49 where Vp is the permeate volume, ?pd is the variation of downstream pressure, A is the effective membrane surface area, t is the experimental time, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature.
(2)
Ideal gas permeability (Pi) was then determined from the steady-state gas flux (Ji), the membrane thickness (l), and the trans-membrane pressure difference (?pi), as shown in eq 3.50
(3)
Gas diffusivity (Di) was determined according eq 4. The time lag parameter (? ) was calculated by extrapolating the slope of the linear portion of the pd vs t curve back to the time axis, where the intercept is equal to ?.50
(4)
After Pi and Di were known, the gas solubility (Si) was calculated using the relationship shown in eq 1. The ideal permeability selectivity (or permselectivity), ?i/j, was obtained by dividing the permeability of the more permeable specie i to the permeability of the less permeable species j. As shown in eq 5, the permselectivity can also be expressed as the product of the diffusivity selectivity and the solubility selectivity:
(5)
The unit for gas permeability is the "Barrer" which is incorporates units of mass transfer, area and pressure.
Here are some results represented graphically:
The caption:
The results of their membranes is compared with some literature values for other PILS
The caption:
Some comments from the conclusion of the paper on the overall results:
Often, while daydreaming, I think of all sorts of Rube Goldberg approaches to carbon capture (involving biomass combustion or heat driven reformation with either water or captured carbon dioxide). One approach that might be available in the short term, given the immediate emergency before thermochemically produced oxygen is available, is the use of compressed air in Brayton type cycles, assuming one can overcome the corrosive properties of sulfur, nitrogen and volatilized alkali metals. (I can imagine these things, but they're Rube Goldberg approaches to be sure.) In the substitution of compressed air for pure oxygen or oxygen/carbon dioxide atmospheres for combustion, the separation of nitrogen from carbon dioxide might prove useful, and one can imagine it indeed being driven by pressure gradients also utilized to turn turbines.
Just some random thoughts, some speculations...
But we're as a race of beings running out of time, even faster than I am running out of time, and I am out of time.
I hope you had a wonderful weekend. I did.
erronis
(15,303 posts)(I'm just an interested citizen - please educate me if I'm wrong!)
Nuclear energy already provides all of the earth's energy through the sun's light and heat (fueled by hydrogen fusing into helium). Wind, waves, etc. are all a result of Sol being there for us.
We need to learn to harness this process and to deal with the radioactive byproducts. We must and we will.
Renewable energy (solar voltaic, wind, hydro, etc.) will only give us a small percentage (<10%?) when they are working well. And they all require large amounts of existing energy to produce the infrastructure and maintenance.