Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumIs lab-grown meat actually worse for the environment?
he idea that we should get our hamburgers from a lab and not from a slaughterhouse the basic premise of the cultured meat or clean meat movement tends to get people excited for two main reasons: It could save billions of animals from immense suffering, and it could fight global warming by reducing the number of methane-producing cattle.
But a new study suggests that the second reason may be wrong, and that lab-grown meat could actually be worse for climate change.
Published February 19 in the journal Frontiers for Sustainable Food Systems, the report argues that lab-grown meat, in the long run, may accelerate climate change more than regular beef does.
The authors note that other studies calculating the greenhouse gas emissions of cattle have lumped the gases together as if theyre all equivalent. But not all gases are created equal. Yes, cows produce a lot of methane, and methane is very bad for global warming. Yet it only lasts in the atmosphere for a dozen years. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, lasts more than a century. And you know what releases a lot of CO2? Labs including those that make cultured meat.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/2/22/18235189/lab-grown-meat-cultured-environment-climate-change
MLAA
(17,298 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,010 posts)NickB79
(19,250 posts)I was going to try one until I read the nutritional value comparison.
MLAA
(17,298 posts)Would love non vegans to try them for cruelty and environmental reasons 🙂
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)From the article: