Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,010 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2019, 10:10 PM Feb 2019

Is lab-grown meat actually worse for the environment?

he idea that we should get our hamburgers from a lab and not from a slaughterhouse — the basic premise of the “cultured meat” or “clean meat” movement — tends to get people excited for two main reasons: It could save billions of animals from immense suffering, and it could fight global warming by reducing the number of methane-producing cattle.

But a new study suggests that the second reason may be wrong, and that lab-grown meat could actually be worse for climate change.

Published February 19 in the journal Frontiers for Sustainable Food Systems, the report argues that lab-grown meat, in the long run, may accelerate climate change more than regular beef does.

The authors note that other studies calculating the greenhouse gas emissions of cattle have lumped the gases together as if they’re all equivalent. But not all gases are created equal. Yes, cows produce a lot of methane, and methane is very bad for global warming. Yet it only lasts in the atmosphere for a dozen years. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, lasts more than a century. And you know what releases a lot of CO2? Labs — including those that make cultured meat.

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/2/22/18235189/lab-grown-meat-cultured-environment-climate-change

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is lab-grown meat actually worse for the environment? (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2019 OP
I go with the Impossible Burger and Beyond Meat Burger, both are planet based 😉 MLAA Feb 2019 #1
I think I'd rather eat that than a frankenburger Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2019 #2
The sodium and saturated fat in the Impossible Burger are crazy high NickB79 Feb 2019 #3
I am vegan, but can't resist a treat now and then. MLAA Feb 2019 #4
There's a giant flaw in that argument DavidDvorkin Feb 2019 #5

NickB79

(19,250 posts)
3. The sodium and saturated fat in the Impossible Burger are crazy high
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 10:31 PM
Feb 2019

I was going to try one until I read the nutritional value comparison.

MLAA

(17,298 posts)
4. I am vegan, but can't resist a treat now and then.
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 10:41 PM
Feb 2019

Would love non vegans to try them for cruelty and environmental reasons 🙂

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
5. There's a giant flaw in that argument
Sun Feb 24, 2019, 03:46 PM
Feb 2019

From the article:

The authors emphasize that their study is based on highly speculative modeling, which is itself based on some pretty strong assumptions. Two of them are especially glaring. The study models what will happen assuming that 1) lab-grown meat will keep being produced using the same methods of energy generation that currently power production, and 2) this will continue over the course of 1,000 years.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Is lab-grown meat actuall...