So The Green New Deal Won't Work. Fine. What Do Critics Have - Anything At All? New Republic
As momentum for the Green New Deal grows, so do its detractors. The ambitious plan to fight climate change introduced by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ed Markey last week has been called everything from brainless to delusional by conservatives. President Donald Trump said it sounded like a high school term paper that got a low mark. Some Democrats have criticized the Green New Deal, too, saying that its goal of net zero carbon emissions by 2030 is unachievable. Others believe the plan doesnt go far enough.
What, then, do these critics propose instead? What should America do to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow catastrophic global warming? Most Republicans dont have an answer to that question because they deny that anything needs to be done at all. But as New Yorker staff writer Osita Nwanevu noted on Twitter, those who accept the dire reality of climate change arent helping by offering empty critiques.
EDIT
Decarbonization is possible, Naam argued, if the U.S. government invested enough resources in low-carbon agriculture, manufacturing research, and new technologies. American companies would be the ones exporting the technology for carbon-free cement, carbon-free steel, carbon-free factories, and that would be a huge opportunity, he said. I think it will have even more impact than the Green New Deal, because the Green New Deal only decarbonizes the United States. We would only reduce global carbon emissions by 15 percent, and thats not enough.
Critics of Naams plan might argue that its far too risky for a problem as dire as climate change. It relies on scientists developing miracle cures for our highest-emitting sectors within just a few yearsand then it relies on industry to successfully deploy those cures across the planet. The plan does not seek to reduce excessive consumption, but to somehow make excessive consumption sustainable. The Green New Deal seems less risky by contrast, since it would mandate the transition to low-carbon energy sources that already exist. The are a lot of questions surrounding the Green New Dealfirst and foremost whether it could ever become lawbut at least it doesnt rely on miracle cures. Its an almost impossible solution to an almost impossible problem.
EDIT
https://newrepublic.com/article/153096/green-new-deal-alternatives-reversing-climate-change