Analysis raises atmospheric, economic doubts about forest bioenergy

[Dead_Parrot]

CORVALLIS, Ore. – A large, global move to produce more energy from forest biomass may be possible and already is beginning in some places, but scientists say in a new analysis that such large-scale bioenergy production from forest biomass is unsustainable and will increase greenhouse gas emissions.

Early suggestions that such a forest biofuel industry would be greenhouse “neutral” or even reduce greenhouse emissions “are based on erroneous assumptions,” a group of international researchers said in an invited analysis in Global Change Biology/Bioenergy, a professional journal.

A major increase in this industry, they concluded, would also result in shorter tree rotations, younger forests, depleted soil nutrients, increased risk of erosion, loss of forest biodiversity and function, higher costs for bioenergy than are now being anticipated, and increased use of fertilizers – also a source of greenhouse emissions.

“The main objective of bioenergy production from forest harvest is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but the strategy is likely to miss the mark,” said Beverly Law, a professor of forest science at Oregon State University and one of the co-authors.

More: http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2012/apr/analysis-raises-atmospheric-economic-doubts-about-forest-bioenergy
Study: http://bit.ly/HySkxu

[pscot]

1. Sometimes erroneous assumptions are all you've got

But as long as they're plausibly erroneous you can still make a buck. For a while.