Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHere's where Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh lands on big science issues
On Monday, President Donald Trump announced his pick of Brett Kavanaugh to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh sat on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for 12 years after he was appointed by President George Bush.
Over his tenure, Kavanaughs rulings often favored industry and opposed government agency rules like net neutrality. Although his written opinions frequently acknowledge the importance of climate change policies, hes a stickler for leaving legal decisions up to Congress. We looked through Kavanaughs record to see where hes come down on major science-related rulings.
Weighing in on air pollution across state lines
Back in 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency called for 28 states to reduce their smog emissions, which are liable to drift across state lines. The fumes carry pollutants like sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxides that cause serious health problems. In his majority opinion, Kavanaugh struck down the emission rule on two accounts. His first complaint was that the restrictions went too far by requiring polluting states to reduce their emissions beyond the extra dose wafting over downwind states. Kavanaugh also wrote the EPA didnt give offending states enough time to implement their own reductions plans.
Money should factor into government decisions to regulate emissions
When the EPA set emissions limits for mercury and other pollutants belching from oil- and gas-fired power plants, the regulations came with a hefty price tagan estimated $9.6 billion each year. A case made its way to the D.C. Circuit Court in 2013, appealing the regulations. The suit was overturned, but Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion, arguing that the EPA should at least consider the financial costs when deciding to impose new regulations. To be sure, EPA could conclude that the benefits outweigh the costs, he wrote. But the problem here is that EPA did not even consider the costs.
https://www.popsci.com/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-science
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,663 posts)He falls down in those areas, IMHO.
I spotted this:
Perhaps the word "not" belongs in the following sentence?
Money should factor into government decisions to regulate emissions