Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
Sun Apr 22, 2018, 11:09 AM Apr 2018

Surprise! 20 Year Study On Elevated CO2 Shows Divergence Between Grasses, Trees In CO2 Uptake

Two major groups of plants have shown a surprising reversal of fortunes in the face of rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

During a 20-year field experiment in Minnesota, a widespread group of plants that initially grew faster when fed more CO2 stopped doing so after 12 years, researchers report in the April 20 Science. Meanwhile, the extra CO2 began to stimulate the growth of a less common group of plants that includes many grasses. This switcheroo, if it holds true elsewhere, suggests that in the future the majority of Earth’s plants might not soak up as much of the greenhouse gas as previously expected, while some grasslands might take up more.

“We need to be less sure about what land ecosystems will do and what we expect in the future,” says ecosystem ecologist Peter Reich of the University of Minnesota in St. Paul, who led the study. Today, land plants scrub about a third of the CO2 that humans emit into the air. “We need to be more worried,” he says, about whether that trend continues.

The two kinds of plants in the study respond differently to CO2 because they use different types of photosynthesis. About 97 percent of plant species, including all trees, use a method called C3, which gets its name from the three-carbon molecules it produces. Most plants using the other method, called C4, are grasses.

EDIT

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/rising-co2-levels-might-not-be-good-plants-we-thought

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Surprise! 20 Year Study On Elevated CO2 Shows Divergence Between Grasses, Trees In CO2 Uptake (Original Post) hatrack Apr 2018 OP
Complicated, not sure I understand the end meaning of this if it holds up over more Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #1
Very informative, thanks for article...nt SWBTATTReg Apr 2018 #2
Ha! Tell this to Scott Pruitt, Eyeball_Kid Apr 2018 #3

Eliot Rosewater

(31,121 posts)
1. Complicated, not sure I understand the end meaning of this if it holds up over more
Sun Apr 22, 2018, 11:14 AM
Apr 2018

study.

What I am sure of is rump voters think it is all gobbleygook and nonsense, science, eh, who needs it. (sarcasm)

They vote, remember this.

Eyeball_Kid

(7,434 posts)
3. Ha! Tell this to Scott Pruitt,
Sun Apr 22, 2018, 12:15 PM
Apr 2018

who hasn’t mowed his lawn for so long, he doesn’t know that grass grows. To Pruitt, the environment is God’s Problem. Pruitt’s problem is opening the regulatory door for polluters to exploit everything, including citizens. CEOs and stockholders are the people who count. The rest are expendable leeches and “takers”.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Surprise! 20 Year Study ...