Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumVogtle Nuclear Construction Faces “Additional Delay” Based on Miscalculations in Foundation Concrete
Press release from NCWarn intended for free distribution
Vogtle Nuclear Construction Faces Additional Delay Based on Miscalculations in Foundation Concrete
Southern Company presses NRC for expedited license amendment to avoid further slippage at Vogtle, construction of nuclear island not yet underway
Durham, NC Less than two months after receiving a nuclear construction license for new reactors at its Vogtle site in eastern Georgia, Southern Company is already requesting a license amendment to allow changes to the foundation on which the reactor building would be built. A request which the company aimed to file by last Friday seeks to relax standards for the concrete foundation due to Southerns miscalculation of soil compaction, and the company is pressing regulators for swift approval to avoid what it calls an additional delay in the construction of the nuclear island basemat structure and subsequent construction activities .
In a letter to the NRC dated March 30, 2012, Southern Company admits that construction of the reactor base has not yet begun and that construction will begin in mid-June if NRC quickly approves the licensing change. It had been thought that pouring of so-called nuclear concrete would begin immediately on issuance of the construction license in February, but the letter confirms the long delay.
Fridays expected License Amendment Request (LAR) is not yet available to the public, but Southern Companys preliminary notice* about the forthcoming amendment request describes how recent surveys determined that a level foundation for three nuclear island buildings cannot be obtained unless the previously allowed one-inch variation in the mudmat substrate is increased to four inches. The nuclear island foundation supports the weight of the buildings and equipment and is vital in protecting the plant against earthquakes and other loads.
Southern told NRC that the increased tolerance should not impact earlier analyses or require additional testing, and it warned that the unforeseen need for the foundation change could cause serious delays to numerous parts of the project. But public interest groups pointed out today that foundational concrete is central to the entire project, and that any relaxing of requirements could have serious safety and cost implications.
32 AMENDMENT REQUESTS = MORE DELAYS?
Additionally, Southern Company has already identified 32 License Amendment Requests it will seek by 2014. The list of LARs** contains little mention of impacts on construction schedule or cost. Nor is it clear how the list of proposed changes might impact a federal lawsuit that is seeking to stop construction at Vogtle.
NC WARN and the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability believe that the changes being sought via the LARs could add millions to cost overruns already documented at Vogtle and lead to other construction delays.
The public interest groups noted today that each LAR proceeding normally takes up to one year or longer, and that one or more of the nine nonprofits contesting the Vogtle project might choose to intervene in any of the 32 license amendments being sought. Regardless of interventions, the NRCs ability to handle so many license amendment reviews is in question.
Also, it is not clear whether Georgia utility law allows Southern to continue construction without the NRCs full approval of LARs while pre-charging ratepayers for the plant. And the problems could further complicate a pending and highly controversial $8.3 federal taxpayer loan guarantee.
Tom Clements of the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability said today, The foundation problem raises questions about quality control and highlight concern about slippages in the construction schedule. The foundation problem and the long list of scheduled license amendments show that other changes and unexpected hurdles are ahead for the Vogtle project.
Southern Company presses NRC for expedited license amendment to avoid further slippage at Vogtle, construction of nuclear island not yet underway
Durham, NC Less than two months after receiving a nuclear construction license for new reactors at its Vogtle site in eastern Georgia, Southern Company is already requesting a license amendment to allow changes to the foundation on which the reactor building would be built. A request which the company aimed to file by last Friday seeks to relax standards for the concrete foundation due to Southerns miscalculation of soil compaction, and the company is pressing regulators for swift approval to avoid what it calls an additional delay in the construction of the nuclear island basemat structure and subsequent construction activities .
In a letter to the NRC dated March 30, 2012, Southern Company admits that construction of the reactor base has not yet begun and that construction will begin in mid-June if NRC quickly approves the licensing change. It had been thought that pouring of so-called nuclear concrete would begin immediately on issuance of the construction license in February, but the letter confirms the long delay.
Fridays expected License Amendment Request (LAR) is not yet available to the public, but Southern Companys preliminary notice* about the forthcoming amendment request describes how recent surveys determined that a level foundation for three nuclear island buildings cannot be obtained unless the previously allowed one-inch variation in the mudmat substrate is increased to four inches. The nuclear island foundation supports the weight of the buildings and equipment and is vital in protecting the plant against earthquakes and other loads.
Southern told NRC that the increased tolerance should not impact earlier analyses or require additional testing, and it warned that the unforeseen need for the foundation change could cause serious delays to numerous parts of the project. But public interest groups pointed out today that foundational concrete is central to the entire project, and that any relaxing of requirements could have serious safety and cost implications.
Southern Company clearly miscalculated soil compaction in the holes excavated for both reactors at the Vogtle site, which could be an omen about the path forward, said Jim Warren of NC WARN today. The NRC simply cannot skip any steps in reviewing this fundamental safety issue just to accommodate the construction schedule, and a public hearing on the design change is warranted.
32 AMENDMENT REQUESTS = MORE DELAYS?
Additionally, Southern Company has already identified 32 License Amendment Requests it will seek by 2014. The list of LARs** contains little mention of impacts on construction schedule or cost. Nor is it clear how the list of proposed changes might impact a federal lawsuit that is seeking to stop construction at Vogtle.
NC WARN and the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability believe that the changes being sought via the LARs could add millions to cost overruns already documented at Vogtle and lead to other construction delays.
The public interest groups noted today that each LAR proceeding normally takes up to one year or longer, and that one or more of the nine nonprofits contesting the Vogtle project might choose to intervene in any of the 32 license amendments being sought. Regardless of interventions, the NRCs ability to handle so many license amendment reviews is in question.
Also, it is not clear whether Georgia utility law allows Southern to continue construction without the NRCs full approval of LARs while pre-charging ratepayers for the plant. And the problems could further complicate a pending and highly controversial $8.3 federal taxpayer loan guarantee.
Tom Clements of the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability said today, The foundation problem raises questions about quality control and highlight concern about slippages in the construction schedule. The foundation problem and the long list of scheduled license amendments show that other changes and unexpected hurdles are ahead for the Vogtle project.
http://www.ncwarn.org/2012/04/vogtle-nuclear-construction-faces-additional-delay-based-on-miscalculations-in-foundation-concrete-a-news-release-from-nc-warn-and-alliance-for-nuclear-accountability/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1204 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vogtle Nuclear Construction Faces “Additional Delay” Based on Miscalculations in Foundation Concrete (Original Post)
kristopher
Apr 2012
OP
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)1. Damn anti-nukers win again
When are we going to just let the nuke people alone to do their thing? What could be wrong with allowing nuke construction to cut a few corners?
Big businesses are just out for profits and the anti-nukers are hurting them every time they try to cash a check from the US government nuke welfare program.
If we let the anti's win again, the lights will go off. Betcha!
kristopher
(29,798 posts)2. Clever b'stards those "anti-nukers" are, eh?
With tactics like these, before you know it the project will be 150% over budget and 6 years behind schedule.
But not to worry, as the CEO of Exelon just pointed out, nuclear construction cost overruns are "on the backs of the ratepayers, not the backs of the shareholders". Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes!