Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumShale Gas Was Going To Make Them Rich; Then The Checks Arrived
Lynne and Bill Seligman thought they were protecting themselves in 2008 when they agreed to allow an Oklahoma company to explore for natural gas under their 91-acre Sullivan County, Pa., farm. They even paid a lawyer to help negotiate the lease.
But since Chesapeake Energy Co. drilled a well to capture gas from the rich Marcellus Shale formation deep under that property, the Seligmans' gas income has shrunk dramatically and not just because production declined or gas prices fell. "I just feel they cheated us," said Lynne Seligman, a retired nursing-home consultant. "They made us promises they didn't fulfill, and I guess that's what really irritates me."
Chesapeake has cut royalty payments to many like the Seligmans, subtracting "post-production costs" from income the landowners said they were promised under the state's Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act of 1979. The law provides that owners of mineral rights receive a minimum one-eighth share, or 12.5 percent, of the sale price of their oil and gas.
Many Marcellus producers began to deduct post-production costs after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court sanctioned the practice in 2010. But Chesapeake, the state's largest producer, has been the most aggressive about billing landowners for the costs. Last year, Chesapeake reduced the Seligmans' $317.57 royalty share for April and May by 90 percent, mailing the Kennett Square family a check for $30.96 for the two months. The deductions were attributed to the costs of gathering, compressing, and transporting the gas.
Other disillusioned landowners say Chesapeake has reduced royalty payments below zero, essentially docking them for the gas produced on their properties. Russ Forba, whose siblings share ownership of a large family property in Wyoming County, said Chesapeake assessed them "negative revenue" for 10 months during the past two years, and estimated that the company has deducted $1.5 million from their royalty payments since its wells began producing in 2014. The most recent check, for production in August and September, amounted to $2,400, a 96 percent reduction from the gross royalty of $55,000, Forba said.
EDIT
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/national-business/article191732109.html
2naSalit
(86,802 posts)Botany
(70,589 posts)So, Chesapeake is billing the land owners for its own operating costs? Not only do they
get the gas but they now have the land owners pay for getting it to the end users. If
that wasn't in the contract then Chesapeake is in violation of the contract and the land owners
should turn off the gas ASAP.
shraby
(21,946 posts)anything, but huge amounts were always deducted with practically no explanation. They were unable to find a lawyer who was versed in fighting the oil companies. They just had to watch the money get stolen month after month.
Botany
(70,589 posts)Edit: The PA A.G. has the case.
Chesapeake denies wrongdoing. In federal court filings, the company says the Pennsylvania attorney general's office and landowners "simply got its facts wrong" about its business arrangements.
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/national-business/article191732109.html#storylink=cpy
shraby
(21,946 posts)Botany
(70,589 posts)n/t
Girard442
(6,085 posts)...big name actors negotiated for a percentage of profits. Then, all these costs just kept coming out of the woodwork and next thing you know, their flick wasn't particularly profitable at all. They got wise and negotiated for a % of the box office instead.
Ohiogal
(32,090 posts)for allowing this to happen in PA. Probably all Republicans in the back pocket of Big Oil and Gas, which is where most of them permanently reside! This is a travesty. Little guy gets screwed again.
nature-lover
(1,471 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,870 posts)Your greed got what it dsserved.