Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 09:35 AM Dec 2017

Shale Gas Was Going To Make Them Rich; Then The Checks Arrived

Lynne and Bill Seligman thought they were protecting themselves in 2008 when they agreed to allow an Oklahoma company to explore for natural gas under their 91-acre Sullivan County, Pa., farm. They even paid a lawyer to help negotiate the lease.

But since Chesapeake Energy Co. drilled a well to capture gas from the rich Marcellus Shale formation deep under that property, the Seligmans' gas income has shrunk dramatically – and not just because production declined or gas prices fell. "I just feel they cheated us," said Lynne Seligman, a retired nursing-home consultant. "They made us promises they didn't fulfill, and I guess that's what really irritates me."

Chesapeake has cut royalty payments to many like the Seligmans, subtracting "post-production costs" from income the landowners said they were promised under the state's Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act of 1979. The law provides that owners of mineral rights receive a minimum one-eighth share, or 12.5 percent, of the sale price of their oil and gas.

Many Marcellus producers began to deduct post-production costs after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court sanctioned the practice in 2010. But Chesapeake, the state's largest producer, has been the most aggressive about billing landowners for the costs. Last year, Chesapeake reduced the Seligmans' $317.57 royalty share for April and May by 90 percent, mailing the Kennett Square family a check for $30.96 for the two months. The deductions were attributed to the costs of gathering, compressing, and transporting the gas.

Other disillusioned landowners say Chesapeake has reduced royalty payments below zero, essentially docking them for the gas produced on their properties. Russ Forba, whose siblings share ownership of a large family property in Wyoming County, said Chesapeake assessed them "negative revenue" for 10 months during the past two years, and estimated that the company has deducted $1.5 million from their royalty payments since its wells began producing in 2014. The most recent check, for production in August and September, amounted to $2,400, a 96 percent reduction from the gross royalty of $55,000, Forba said.

EDIT

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/national-business/article191732109.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Botany

(70,589 posts)
2. I hope these people get good lawyers and sue the hell out of Chesapeake Energy.
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 10:11 AM
Dec 2017

So, Chesapeake is billing the land owners for its own operating costs? Not only do they
get the gas but they now have the land owners pay for getting it to the end users. If
that wasn't in the contract then Chesapeake is in violation of the contract and the land owners
should turn off the gas ASAP.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
3. They did that with my parent's oil well in Michigan. They never got negative
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 10:21 AM
Dec 2017

anything, but huge amounts were always deducted with practically no explanation. They were unable to find a lawyer who was versed in fighting the oil companies. They just had to watch the money get stolen month after month.

Botany

(70,589 posts)
5. With the amount of money involved here there must be a good lawyer to take the case.
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 10:28 AM
Dec 2017

Edit: The PA A.G. has the case.

Chesapeake denies wrongdoing. In federal court filings, the company says the Pennsylvania attorney general's office and landowners "simply got its facts wrong" about its business arrangements.

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/national-business/article191732109.html#storylink=cpy

Girard442

(6,085 posts)
4. Once upon a time in Hollywood...
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 10:27 AM
Dec 2017

...big name actors negotiated for a percentage of profits. Then, all these costs just kept coming out of the woodwork and next thing you know, their flick wasn't particularly profitable at all. They got wise and negotiated for a % of the box office instead.

Ohiogal

(32,090 posts)
6. Blame the legislators
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 10:31 AM
Dec 2017

for allowing this to happen in PA. Probably all Republicans in the back pocket of Big Oil and Gas, which is where most of them permanently reside! This is a travesty. Little guy gets screwed again.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Shale Gas Was Going To Ma...