Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBP & Shell Privately Planning For 5C Warming While Publicly "Committing" To 2C Paris Target
Oil giants Shell and BP are planning for global temperatures to rise as much as 5°C by the middle of the century. The level is more than double the upper limit committed to by most countries in the world under the Paris Climate Agreement, which both companies publicly support.
The discrepancy demonstrates that the companies are keeping shareholders in the dark about the risks posed to their businesses by climate change, according to two new reports published by investment campaign group Share Action. Many climate scientists say that a temperature rise of 5°C would be catastrophic for the planet.
ShareAction claims that the companies actions put the value of millions of people's pensions at risk. Two years after BP and Shell shareholders voted resoundingly in favour of forcing the companies to make detailed disclosures about climate risks, the companies have made unconvincing steps forward, according to the reports.
EDIT
Neither company sets targets to reduce emissions and BPs total investment in renewable and clean technologies has actually shrunk since 2005, the reports said. Thats despite the companys public-facing image of being beyond petroleum. BP invests just 1.3 per cent of its total capital expenditure in low-carbon projects while Shell has pledged to invest 3 per cent of its annual spend on low-carbon by 2020. Both companies assess the resilience of their businesses against climate models in which temperatures warm by between 3°C and 5°C.
EDIT
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/bp-shell-oil-global-warming-5-degree-paris-climate-agreement-fossil-fuels-temperature-rise-a8022511.html
DK504
(3,847 posts)70's showing there will be global warming. In the 80's they buried it so fossil fuels would stay top dog. Gotta look for that.
These "people", well I can't call them pigs, I don't want to insult pigs, maybe cockroaches.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Javaman
(62,530 posts)NickB79
(19,246 posts)Because that kind of a spike would almost guarantee 8+C by 2100, leaving half the planet a broiling hellscape. Only the poles would still be temperate.