Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(19,257 posts)
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 05:34 PM Mar 2017

Trees might not be able to store as much carbon as we thought, new study suggests

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/773ec90e-7e84-3b79-935b-301578818f31/trees-might-not-be-able-to.html

Researchers at Western Sydney University (WSU) in Australia have found that "common" Australian trees do not store as much carbon as had been previously assumed, a discovery that could have big implications on how we tackle climate change.

According to a news release from the university, the study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, found that Eucalyptus forests may require extra soil nutrients to grow and "take advantage" of additional carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere.

Large areas of "remnant native eucalypt forest" were exposed to heightened levels of CO2 at a WSU facility. Researchers found that while the extra CO2 increased levels of photosynthesis, it did not result in increases in leaves, stems and wood.

WSU said that this was in contrast to research conducted in the U.S. and Europe. Teams there had added extra CO2 to areas of temperate forests, and trees' growth had increased by roughly 23 percent.


Whoops.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Trees might not be able t...