Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumIce Age hunters destroyed forests throughout Europe
Last edited Thu Dec 1, 2016, 08:50 PM - Edit history (1)
https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2016/12/ice-age-hunters-destroyed-forests-throughout-europe28 November 2016
[font size=4]Large-scale forest fires started by prehistoric hunter-gatherers are probably the reason why Europe is not more densely forested. This is the finding of an international team, including climate researcher Professor Jed Kaplan of the University of Lausanne and archaeologist Professor Jan Kolen of Leiden University. Publication on 30 November in PLOS ONE.[/font]
[font size=3]Deliberate or negligent
This research has generated new insights on the role of hunters in the formation of the landscape. It may be that during the coldest phase of the last Ice Age, some 20,000 years ago, hunter-gatherers deliberately lit forest fires in an attempt to create grasslands and park-like forests. They probably did this to attract wild animals and to make it easier to gather vegetable food and raw materials; it also facilitated movement. Another possibility is that the large-scale forests and steppe fires may have been the result of the hunters' negligent use of fire in these semi-open landscapes.[/font]
[font size=1]Reconstruction of a fire in a semi-open landscape.[/font]
[font size=3]The researchers combined analyses of Ice Age accumulations of silt and computer simulations with new interpretations of archaeological data. They show that hunters throughout Europe, from Spain to Russia, were capable of altering the landscape. This first large-scale impact of humans on landscape and vegetation would have taken place more than 20,000 years before the industrial revolution. The Ice Age is often presented as an era of extreme cold and snow that was ruled by mammoths, bison and giant bears. But the researchers show that humans were also capable of having a significant impact on the landscape.
Layers of ash
Searching for evidence of this human impact explains why there are conflicting reconstructions for this period. Reconstructions of the vegetation based on pollen and plant remains from lakes and marshland suggest that Europe had an open steppe vegetation. But computer simulations based on eight possible climate scenarios show that under natural conditions the landscape in large areas of Europe would have been far more densely forested. The researchers conclude that humans must have been responsible for the difference. Further evidence has been found in the traces of the use of fire in hunting settlements from this period and in the layers of ash in the soil.
[/font]
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)The paper ( http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166726 - your PLOS link goes to a paper about myeloma cells) talks about why the evidence show must less forestation during the Last Glacial Maximum, 20,000 years ago, than simulations without humans predict. It doesn't say that this then affected Europe all the way through the subsequent 20,000 years with all the climate changes involved. With the retreat of ice sheets and warming temperatures, the forestation would be bound to change.
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)(Fixed.)
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,857 posts)Cut down all the trees on Easter Island.
Probably responsible for several extinct large species in America after the "natives" arrived. White settlers much later killed off many buffalo to near-extinction.
Aren't we something?