Why the nuclear industry doesn't properly plan and train for their disasters.

[kristopher]

Industry body opposed boosting nuke disaster prevention steps before Fukushima crisis
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20120327p2a00m0na015000c.html

The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (FEPC) had told the government's Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) in writing that it would oppose any plans to step up preventative measures against nuclear accidents shortly before the outbreak on March 11, 2011, of the crisis at the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant, according to documents obtained by the Mainichi through information disclosure laws.

The FEPC, which groups 10 power companies in the country, said in written documents addressed to the NSC that it would stand against the government body's move to strengthen the country's preventative measures against nuclear accidentsThe revelation shows that the utility firms in the country downplayed preventative measures against nuclear accidents.

... such plans would give the impression that nuclear power was dangerous and affect the regions hosting nuclear power plants accordingly, as well as push up costs for such measures.

..."It would amplify public fears about nuclear power."

..."It could cause land prices to fall and reduce the number of tourists."

..."Local governments that fall within the zone will demand subsidies."


The attitude here is exactly the same, the public in the area of nuclear power plants is completely unprepared for an orderly response to a large scale release of radioactivity such as we've seen at Chernobyl and Fukushima.

[freshwest]

1. $$$

[kristopher]

2. It is a global industry not a branch of science.

So yes, their guiding light emanates from a currency symbol.

[KT2000]

3. this argument is used

by those promoting the use of toxic chemicals too. Efforts at prevention bring attention to the risk. It also implies a liability. That is what they are really afraid of.
The same argument can be said of the move to get rid of regulations.

[kristopher]

4. I can see the link to other toxic facilities but...

...would you mind elaborating on the way you see it applied to regulations?

[KT2000]

5. regulations imply responsibility

that is something business does not want to assume - at least those who object to regulations. Responsiblity can lead to liaiblity.