Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Small clique of nations found to dominate global trading web of food, water
http://www.agu.org/news/press/pr_archives/2012/2012-17.shtml[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Small clique of nations found to dominate global trading web of food, water[/font]
22 March 2012
AGU Release No. 12-17
For Immediate Release
[font size=3]WASHINGTON—It’s not easy, or economically feasible, to ship freshwater across the globe. But when scientists use food as a proxy for that water — taking into account how much crops are irrigated and livestock are fed — they can get a glimpse of the flow of freshwater between countries. When one research group studied this “virtual water network,” they found that the interconnectedness between countries has almost doubled over the last two decades — potentially lending some resiliency to the water trade. Still, a handful of nations control a majority of the freshwater flow, and some regions, including much of Africa, are left out of the trading loop.
“In general, we have more trade going on, and more and more countries are now connected,” said Joel Carr, an ecohydrologist with the University of Virginia in Charlottesville and one of the authors of the new study. “But these increases in trade and connections are not equally spread among countries.”
Food production is one of the primary uses of fresh water, and as countries grow in population, they need more food, and therefore more water, to support their residents. If they don’t have the water to grow crops or raise livestock but have money to spend, countries can import food – essentially importing water. The virtual water network is a way to look at the global balance of this freshwater trade, Carr said.
Carr and his colleagues studied the changes in the network — variations in how much virtual water (i.e. food) was being traded, which countries were trading, etc. — between 1986 and 2008. In that first year, there were 205 countries trading with each other, with about 8,200 trade links between them. In 2008, the number of countries trading virtual water had increased to 232, and the number of links had almost doubled to about 15,800 links.
...[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL04683722 March 2012
AGU Release No. 12-17
For Immediate Release
[font size=3]WASHINGTON—It’s not easy, or economically feasible, to ship freshwater across the globe. But when scientists use food as a proxy for that water — taking into account how much crops are irrigated and livestock are fed — they can get a glimpse of the flow of freshwater between countries. When one research group studied this “virtual water network,” they found that the interconnectedness between countries has almost doubled over the last two decades — potentially lending some resiliency to the water trade. Still, a handful of nations control a majority of the freshwater flow, and some regions, including much of Africa, are left out of the trading loop.
“In general, we have more trade going on, and more and more countries are now connected,” said Joel Carr, an ecohydrologist with the University of Virginia in Charlottesville and one of the authors of the new study. “But these increases in trade and connections are not equally spread among countries.”
Food production is one of the primary uses of fresh water, and as countries grow in population, they need more food, and therefore more water, to support their residents. If they don’t have the water to grow crops or raise livestock but have money to spend, countries can import food – essentially importing water. The virtual water network is a way to look at the global balance of this freshwater trade, Carr said.
Carr and his colleagues studied the changes in the network — variations in how much virtual water (i.e. food) was being traded, which countries were trading, etc. — between 1986 and 2008. In that first year, there were 205 countries trading with each other, with about 8,200 trade links between them. In 2008, the number of countries trading virtual water had increased to 232, and the number of links had almost doubled to about 15,800 links.
...[/font][/font]
